Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

UNSW Justice Inclusion Access (JEINA)UNSW Justice Inclusion Access (JEINA)
VS
The Johns Hopkins UniversityThe Johns Hopkins University
UNSW Justice Inclusion Access (JEINA)

UNSW Justice Inclusion Access (JEINA)

High St, Sydney, AU

Last Update: 22/03/2026

View Profile

JEINA, a name inspired by the Kurdish word ژینا meaning ‘life/life-giver’ is a program designed by a team of women at UNSW Sydney with lived experience of forced migration. JEINA is building an equitable future for women from forced migration background through higher e...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:37
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
The Johns Hopkins University

The Johns Hopkins University

3400 N Charles St, Mason Hall, Baltimore, MD, US, 21218-2688

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://jhu.edu
804/1000Good

We are America’s first research university, founded in 1876 on the principle that by pursuing big ideas and sharing what we learn, we can make the world a better place. For more than 140 years, our faculty and students have worked side by side in pursuit of discoveries ...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:17,735
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
UNSW Justice Inclusion Access (JEINA)

UNSW Justice Inclusion Access (JEINA)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
The Johns Hopkins University

The Johns Hopkins University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UNSW Justice Inclusion Access (JEINA) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Johns Hopkins University in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - UNSW Justice Inclusion Access (JEINA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UNSW Justice Inclusion Access (JEINA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - The Johns Hopkins University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Johns Hopkins University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
UNSW Justice Inclusion Access (JEINA)

UNSW Justice Inclusion Access (JEINA)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
The Johns Hopkins University

The Johns Hopkins University

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between UNSW Justice Inclusion Access (JEINA) company and The Johns Hopkins University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between UNSW Justice Inclusion Access (JEINA) company and The Johns Hopkins University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between UNSW Justice Inclusion Access (JEINA) company and The Johns Hopkins University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between UNSW Justice Inclusion Access (JEINA) company and The Johns Hopkins University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between UNSW Justice Inclusion Access (JEINA) company and The Johns Hopkins University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between UNSW Justice Inclusion Access (JEINA) company and The Johns Hopkins University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between UNSW Justice Inclusion Access (JEINA) company and The Johns Hopkins University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between UNSW Justice Inclusion Access (JEINA) company and The Johns Hopkins University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between UNSW Justice Inclusion Access (JEINA) company and The Johns Hopkins University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between UNSW Justice Inclusion Access (JEINA) company and The Johns Hopkins University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between UNSW Justice Inclusion Access (JEINA) company and The Johns Hopkins University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between UNSW Justice Inclusion Access (JEINA) and The Johns Hopkins University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between UNSW Justice Inclusion Access (JEINA) and The Johns Hopkins University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - UNSW Justice Inclusion Access (JEINA) or The Johns Hopkins University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - UNSW Justice Inclusion Access (JEINA) or The Johns Hopkins University ?
Between UNSW Justice Inclusion Access (JEINA) and The Johns Hopkins University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between UNSW Justice Inclusion Access (JEINA) and The Johns Hopkins University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1