Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

UNSW Gendered Violence Research NetworkUNSW Gendered Violence Research Network
VS
University of RochesterUniversity of Rochester
UNSW Gendered Violence Research Network

UNSW Gendered Violence Research Network

N/A

Last Update: 29/11/2025

View Profile

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:30
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
University of Rochester

University of Rochester

Wilson Blvd. - Wallis Hall, Rochester, NY, US, 14627-0011

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://rochester.edu
793/1000Fair

The University of Rochester is a private research university located in Rochester, New York. Our campuses are home to more than 6,500 undergraduates and nearly 5,500 graduate students who come from across the United States and around the world to pursue their academic g...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:11,560
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
UNSW Gendered Violence Research Network

UNSW Gendered Violence Research Network

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
University of Rochester

University of Rochester

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UNSW Gendered Violence Research Network in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Rochester in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - UNSW Gendered Violence Research Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UNSW Gendered Violence Research Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - University of Rochester (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Rochester cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
UNSW Gendered Violence Research Network

UNSW Gendered Violence Research Network

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
University of Rochester

University of Rochester

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between UNSW Gendered Violence Research Network company and University of Rochester company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between UNSW Gendered Violence Research Network company and University of Rochester company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between UNSW Gendered Violence Research Network company and University of Rochester company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between UNSW Gendered Violence Research Network company and University of Rochester company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between UNSW Gendered Violence Research Network company and University of Rochester company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between UNSW Gendered Violence Research Network company and University of Rochester company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between UNSW Gendered Violence Research Network company and University of Rochester company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between UNSW Gendered Violence Research Network company and University of Rochester company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between UNSW Gendered Violence Research Network company and University of Rochester company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between UNSW Gendered Violence Research Network company and University of Rochester company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between UNSW Gendered Violence Research Network company and University of Rochester company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between UNSW Gendered Violence Research Network and University of Rochester, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between UNSW Gendered Violence Research Network and University of Rochester, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - UNSW Gendered Violence Research Network or University of Rochester ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - UNSW Gendered Violence Research Network or University of Rochester ?
Between UNSW Gendered Violence Research Network and University of Rochester, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between UNSW Gendered Violence Research Network and University of Rochester, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1