Comparison Overview
UNSW Engineering
UNSW Engineering
High St, Kensington, 2033, AU
Last Update: 19/02/2026
The Faculty of Engineering at UNSW is the pre-eminent centre for engineering studies and research in Australia, offering the country’s most comprehensive range of undergraduate, postgraduate, research and continuing education courses. A founding faculty of UNSW, the Fa...
Université de Montréal
Station Centre-ville, H3C 3J7, Montreal, Montréal, QC, CA
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Université de Montréal and its two affiliated schools, Polytechnique Montréal and HEC Montréal, is Quebec's biggest university complex and one of the largest in North America. Its 450,000 graduates make their presence felt around the globe and in every sphere of activit...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
UNSW Engineering
Université de Montréal
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for UNSW Engineering in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Université de Montréal in 2026.
Incident History - UNSW Engineering (X = Date, Y = Severity)
UNSW Engineering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Université de Montréal (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Université de Montréal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
UNSW Engineering
Université de Montréal
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.