Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

UNSW CanberraUNSW Canberra
VS
University of WashingtonUniversity of Washington
UNSW Canberra

UNSW Canberra

Northcott Drive, Canberra, ACT, 2600, AU

Last Update: 27/10/2025

View Profile
774/1000Fair

UNSW established a college known as UNSW Canberra responsible for conducting academic programs and research. UNSW Canberra offers undergraduate programs leading to bachelor degrees in Arts, Business, Engineering, Science, and Technology. Additionally we offer opportunit...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:661
Subsidiaries:30
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
University of Washington

University of Washington

1400 NE Campus Parkway, Seattle, WA, US, 98195-4550

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://uw.edu
815/1000Good

Founded in 1861, the University of Washington is one of the oldest state-supported institutions of higher education on the West Coast and is one of the preeminent research universities in the world. Located minutes from downtown Seattle, the main UW campus provides gorg...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:31,670
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
UNSW Canberra

UNSW Canberra

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
University of Washington

University of Washington

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UNSW Canberra in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

University of Washington has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - UNSW Canberra (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UNSW Canberra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - University of Washington (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Washington cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
UNSW Canberra

UNSW Canberra

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
University of Washington

University of Washington

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ORA1782750283

FAQ

Between UNSW Canberra company and University of Washington company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between UNSW Canberra company and University of Washington company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between UNSW Canberra company and University of Washington company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between UNSW Canberra company and University of Washington company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between UNSW Canberra company and University of Washington company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between UNSW Canberra company and University of Washington company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between UNSW Canberra company and University of Washington company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between UNSW Canberra company and University of Washington company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between UNSW Canberra company and University of Washington company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between UNSW Canberra company and University of Washington company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between UNSW Canberra company and University of Washington company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between UNSW Canberra and University of Washington, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between UNSW Canberra and University of Washington, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - UNSW Canberra or University of Washington ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - UNSW Canberra or University of Washington ?
Between UNSW Canberra and University of Washington, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between UNSW Canberra and University of Washington, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1