Comparison Overview

UNSW

VS

University of Kentucky

UNSW

Gate 9, High St Kensington 2052, Sydney, New South Wales (NSW), AU, 2052
Last Update: 2026-01-24
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.unsw.edu.au/

The University of New South Wales (UNSW) is one of Australia's leading research and teaching universities. Established in 1949, UNSW has expanded rapidly and now has more than 52,000 students, including more than 14,000 international students from over 130 different countries. UNSW offers more than 300 undergraduate and 600 postgraduate programs, and has developed an extensive network of alumni chapters throughout Asia. UNSW is a founding member of the prestigious Group of Eight research intensive universities in Australia and a member of the Universitas 21 international consortium. The main UNSW campus is located on a 38-hectare site at Kensington, in Sydney. Other campuses are UNSW Art and Design (Paddington), UNSW Canberra (Canberra City and Australian Defence Force Academy), and sub-campuses at Randwick and Coogee, as well as research stations around NSW. We believe in academic freedom, so posts do not necessarily represent official UNSW views. Read our Social Media Terms of Service at www.unsw.to/sm UNSW Sydney CRICOS no.00098G facebook.com/unsw twitter.com/unsw instagram.com/unsw youtube.com/unsw

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 17,231
Subsidiaries: 30
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

University of Kentucky

undefined, Lexington, KY, 40506, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 800 and 849
https://www.uky.edu/

The University of Kentucky is a public, research-extensive, land grant university dedicated to improving people's lives through excellence in teaching, research, health care, cultural enrichment, and economic development for over 150 years. The University of Kentucky: - Facilitates learning, informed by scholarship and research. - Expands knowledge through research, scholarship and creative activity. - Serves a global community by disseminating, sharing and applying knowledge. The University, as the flagship institution, plays a critical leadership role for the Commonwealth by contributing to the economic development and quality of life within Kentucky's borders and beyond. The University nurtures a diverse community characterized by fairness and equal opportunity. From Paducah to Pikeville, Covington to Cumberland, the University of Kentucky touches lives across the Bluegrass State, providing education, cultural stimulation and economic development in all 120 counties. Considering that residents of all Kentucky counties benefit from the University's medical care, community service, innovative research and creative teaching and instruction, there's no question UK is The University of Kentucky.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 22,493
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unsw.jpeg
UNSW
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/universityofkentucky.jpeg
University of Kentucky
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
UNSW
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of Kentucky
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UNSW in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Kentucky in 2026.

Incident History — UNSW (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UNSW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — University of Kentucky (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Kentucky cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unsw.jpeg
UNSW
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/universityofkentucky.jpeg
University of Kentucky
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

UNSW company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to University of Kentucky company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, University of Kentucky company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to UNSW company.

In the current year, University of Kentucky company and UNSW company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither University of Kentucky company nor UNSW company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither University of Kentucky company nor UNSW company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither University of Kentucky company nor UNSW company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither UNSW company nor University of Kentucky company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither UNSW nor University of Kentucky holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

UNSW company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to University of Kentucky company.

University of Kentucky company employs more people globally than UNSW company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither UNSW nor University of Kentucky holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither UNSW nor University of Kentucky holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither UNSW nor University of Kentucky holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither UNSW nor University of Kentucky holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither UNSW nor University of Kentucky holds HIPAA certification.

Neither UNSW nor University of Kentucky holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References