Comparison Overview
UNSW CIBEL Centre

UNSW CIBEL Centre
Union Road, Sydney, 2052, AU
Last Update: 13/12/2025
UNSW Law & Justice’s China International Business and Economic Law (CIBEL) Centre is the world’s leading centre outside of China for the study and teaching of CIBEL matters, particularly to the Australia-China trading corridor. The CIBEL Centre was established in 2015 a...

The George Washington University
2121 I Street, NW, Washington, D.C., US, 20052
Last Update: 02/04/2026
The George Washington University, an independent academic institution chartered by the Congress of the United States in 1821, dedicates itself to furthering human well-being. The University values a dynamic, student-focused community stimulated by cultural and intellect...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

UNSW CIBEL Centre







The George Washington University






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for UNSW CIBEL Centre in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for The George Washington University in 2026.
Incident History - UNSW CIBEL Centre (X = Date, Y = Severity)
UNSW CIBEL Centre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - The George Washington University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
The George Washington University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

UNSW CIBEL Centre

The George Washington University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.