Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

UNSW Australian Research Centre for Cancer SurvivorshipUNSW Australian Research Centre for Cancer Survivorship
VS
Brigham Young UniversityBrigham Young University
UNSW Australian Research Centre for Cancer Survivorship

UNSW Australian Research Centre for Cancer Survivorship

N/A

Last Update: 25/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.unsw.edu.au
770/1000Fair

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Brigham Young University

Brigham Young University

Main Campus, Provo, UT, US, 84602

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://byu.edu
800/1000Good

We believe a world yearning for hope and joy needs the graduates of Brigham Young University—disciples of Jesus Christ who are driven by love for God and His children and who are prepared to serve and lead. This preparation demands a unique university model: at BYU, bel...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:16,614
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
UNSW Australian Research Centre for Cancer Survivorship

UNSW Australian Research Centre for Cancer Survivorship

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Brigham Young University

Brigham Young University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UNSW Australian Research Centre for Cancer Survivorship in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brigham Young University in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - UNSW Australian Research Centre for Cancer Survivorship (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UNSW Australian Research Centre for Cancer Survivorship cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Brigham Young University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brigham Young University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
UNSW Australian Research Centre for Cancer Survivorship

UNSW Australian Research Centre for Cancer Survivorship

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Brigham Young University

Brigham Young University

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
BRI21381123

FAQ

Between UNSW Australian Research Centre for Cancer Survivorship company and Brigham Young University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between UNSW Australian Research Centre for Cancer Survivorship company and Brigham Young University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between UNSW Australian Research Centre for Cancer Survivorship company and Brigham Young University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between UNSW Australian Research Centre for Cancer Survivorship company and Brigham Young University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between UNSW Australian Research Centre for Cancer Survivorship company and Brigham Young University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between UNSW Australian Research Centre for Cancer Survivorship company and Brigham Young University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between UNSW Australian Research Centre for Cancer Survivorship company and Brigham Young University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between UNSW Australian Research Centre for Cancer Survivorship company and Brigham Young University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between UNSW Australian Research Centre for Cancer Survivorship company and Brigham Young University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between UNSW Australian Research Centre for Cancer Survivorship company and Brigham Young University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between UNSW Australian Research Centre for Cancer Survivorship company and Brigham Young University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between UNSW Australian Research Centre for Cancer Survivorship and Brigham Young University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between UNSW Australian Research Centre for Cancer Survivorship and Brigham Young University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - UNSW Australian Research Centre for Cancer Survivorship or Brigham Young University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - UNSW Australian Research Centre for Cancer Survivorship or Brigham Young University ?
Between UNSW Australian Research Centre for Cancer Survivorship and Brigham Young University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between UNSW Australian Research Centre for Cancer Survivorship and Brigham Young University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-48579
SUMMARY

Improper authorization in Microsoft Exchange Online allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-04
UPDATED
Date2026-06-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48567
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass by spoofing in Azure HorizonDB allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-04
UPDATED
Date2026-06-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-47655
SUMMARY

Exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor in Microsoft Graph allows an authorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-04
UPDATED
Date2026-06-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-47644
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of special elements in output used by a downstream component ('injection') in Copilot Chat (Microsoft Edge) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-04
UPDATED
Date2026-06-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-45497
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') in Microsoft Copilot allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-04
UPDATED
Date2026-06-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8