Comparison Overview
University of Sunderland

University of Sunderland
Edinburgh Building, City Campus, Chester Road,, Sunderland, Tyne and Wear, GB, SR1 3SD
Last Update: 30/03/2026
The life-changing University of Sunderland is recognised as one of the great, modern, civic universities. We are respected for the transformative impact we have on our students, the relevance of our programme and for our ambition. We have close to 20,000 students base...

Florida State University
222 S. Copeland Street, Tallahassee, fl, US, 32306-1037
Last Update: 30/06/2026
Florida State University offers a unique academic environment built on our cherished values, distinctive heritage, and welcoming campus. Florida State has it all, offering nationally-ranked academics, world-renowned faculty, championship athletics, and a prime location ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

University of Sunderland







Florida State University






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for University of Sunderland in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Florida State University in 2026.
Incident History - University of Sunderland (X = Date, Y = Severity)
University of Sunderland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Florida State University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Florida State University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

University of Sunderland

Florida State University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.
In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp
Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.