Comparison Overview
University of Rochester Medical Center
University of Rochester Medical Center
601 Elmwood Avenue, None, Rochester, NY, US, 14642
Last Update: 31/12/2025
The University of Rochester Medical Center is one of the top academic medical centers in the country and the only one in our area. Our hospitals, research centers, physicians' offices, schools and health services attract patients and doctors from all over the world. T...
NYC Health + Hospitals
50 Water St., New York, NY, US, 10004
Last Update: 19/05/2026
NYC Health + Hospitals is the nation’s largest public health care delivery system. We are an integrated network of hospitals, trauma centers, neighborhood health centers, nursing homes, and post-acute care centers. We are a home care agency and a health plan, MetroPlus....
Compliance Ranges Comparison
University of Rochester Medical Center
NYC Health + Hospitals
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for University of Rochester Medical Center in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
NYC Health + Hospitals has 8.26% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - University of Rochester Medical Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)
University of Rochester Medical Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - NYC Health + Hospitals (X = Date, Y = Severity)
NYC Health + Hospitals cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
University of Rochester Medical Center
NYC Health + Hospitals
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in ealpha072 Student-Management-System up to 01451bd7a2f58cdda07bd0b86e3967582e3ecd08. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file admin/config.php of the component Administrative Backend. Such manipulation leads to improper authentication. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. This product utilizes a rolling release system for continuous delivery, and as such, version information for affected or updated releases is not disclosed. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A vulnerability was determined in sgl-project SGLang up to 0.5.11. Affected by this vulnerability is the function data_hash of the component Cache Handler. This manipulation causes denial of service. The attack is restricted to local execution. A high degree of complexity is needed for the attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.
Active IQ OneCollect version 2.7.3 contains hard-coded credentials that could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized AutoSupport operations.
Active IQ Config Advisor version 6.7.3 contains hard-coded credentials that could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized AutoSupport operations.
A vulnerability was found in crmeb crmeb_java 1.4. Affected is the function RestTemplate.getForEntity of the file crmeb-common/src/main/java/com/zbkj/common/utils/RestTemplateUtil.java of the component base64 Qrcode Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.