Comparison Overview
University of Oklahoma
University of Oklahoma
660 N Parrington Oval, Norman, Oklahoma, US, 73019
Last Update: 07/05/2026
Attracting top students from across the nation and more than 100 countries around the world, OU provides a major university experience in a private college atmosphere. In fact, OU is number one in the nation in the number of National Merit Scholars enrolled at a public...
University of Southern California
3551 Trousdale Parkway, Los Angeles, CA, US, 90089
Last Update: 01/04/2026
The University of Southern California is a leading private research university located in Los Angeles, the capital of the Pacific Rim. This is the official LinkedIn presence for the University of Southern California. This account is managed and mediated by the staff of...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
University of Oklahoma
University of Southern California
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
University of Oklahoma has 44.75% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for University of Southern California in 2026.
Incident History - University of Oklahoma (X = Date, Y = Severity)
University of Oklahoma cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - University of Southern California (X = Date, Y = Severity)
University of Southern California cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
University of Oklahoma
University of Southern California
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in ealpha072 Student-Management-System up to 01451bd7a2f58cdda07bd0b86e3967582e3ecd08. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file admin/config.php of the component Administrative Backend. Such manipulation leads to improper authentication. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. This product utilizes a rolling release system for continuous delivery, and as such, version information for affected or updated releases is not disclosed. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A vulnerability was determined in sgl-project SGLang up to 0.5.11. Affected by this vulnerability is the function data_hash of the component Cache Handler. This manipulation causes denial of service. The attack is restricted to local execution. A high degree of complexity is needed for the attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.
Active IQ OneCollect version 2.7.3 contains hard-coded credentials that could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized AutoSupport operations.
Active IQ Config Advisor version 6.7.3 contains hard-coded credentials that could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized AutoSupport operations.
A vulnerability was found in crmeb crmeb_java 1.4. Affected is the function RestTemplate.getForEntity of the file crmeb-common/src/main/java/com/zbkj/common/utils/RestTemplateUtil.java of the component base64 Qrcode Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.