Comparison Overview
University of Nottingham

University of Nottingham
University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, GB
Last Update: 10/06/2026
The University of Nottingham is a pioneering university that transforms the lives of our 45,000 students at our campuses in the UK, China and Malaysia.

Yale University
Woodbridge Hall, New Haven, CT, US, 6520
Last Update: 08/05/2026
For more than 300 years, Yale University has inspired the minds that inspire the world. Based in New Haven, Connecticut, Yale brings people and ideas together for positive impact around the globe. A research university that focuses on students and encourages learning as...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

University of Nottingham







Yale University






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
University of Nottingham has 40.83% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
Yale University has 4.76% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - University of Nottingham (X = Date, Y = Severity)
University of Nottingham cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Yale University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Yale University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

University of Nottingham

Yale University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.
In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp
Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.