Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

University of Missouri-ColumbiaUniversity of Missouri-Columbia
VS
University of Wisconsin-MadisonUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Missouri-Columbia

University of Missouri-Columbia

105 Jesse Hall, Columbia, MO, US, 65211

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.missouri.edu
800/1000Good

We are Mizzou! Our distinct mission, as Missouri's only state-supported member of the Association of American Universities, is to provide all Missourians the benefits of a world-class research university. We are stewards and builders of a priceless state resource, a uni...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:14,645
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
University of Wisconsin-Madison

University of Wisconsin-Madison

500 Lincoln Dr, Madison, WI, US, 53706-1380

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://wisc.edu
811/1000Good

In achievement and prestige, the University of Wisconsin–Madison has long been recognized as one of America's great universities. A public, land-grant institution, UW–Madison offers a complete spectrum of liberal arts studies, professional programs and student activitie...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:30,912
Subsidiaries:24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
University of Missouri-Columbia

University of Missouri-Columbia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
University of Wisconsin-Madison

University of Wisconsin-Madison

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Missouri-Columbia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Wisconsin-Madison in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - University of Missouri-Columbia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Missouri-Columbia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - University of Wisconsin-Madison (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Wisconsin-Madison cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
University of Missouri-Columbia

University of Missouri-Columbia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
University of Wisconsin-Madison

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between University of Missouri-Columbia company and University of Wisconsin-Madison company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between University of Missouri-Columbia company and University of Wisconsin-Madison company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between University of Missouri-Columbia company and University of Wisconsin-Madison company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between University of Missouri-Columbia company and University of Wisconsin-Madison company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between University of Missouri-Columbia company and University of Wisconsin-Madison company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between University of Missouri-Columbia company and University of Wisconsin-Madison company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between University of Missouri-Columbia company and University of Wisconsin-Madison company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between University of Missouri-Columbia company and University of Wisconsin-Madison company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between University of Missouri-Columbia company and University of Wisconsin-Madison company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between University of Missouri-Columbia company and University of Wisconsin-Madison company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between University of Missouri-Columbia company and University of Wisconsin-Madison company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between University of Missouri-Columbia and University of Wisconsin-Madison, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between University of Missouri-Columbia and University of Wisconsin-Madison, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - University of Missouri-Columbia or University of Wisconsin-Madison ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - University of Missouri-Columbia or University of Wisconsin-Madison ?
Between University of Missouri-Columbia and University of Wisconsin-Madison, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between University of Missouri-Columbia and University of Wisconsin-Madison, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1