Comparison Overview
University of Missouri St. Louis College of Business Administration
University of Missouri St. Louis College of Business Administration
One University Blvd, St Louis, Missouri, 63121, US
Last Update: 18/12/2025
We provide accessible, innovative, and research-informed, public education that impacts lives. We advance real-world, relevant, and impactful research. We partner with alumni and business leaders to drive regional economic development.
The University of Alabama
739 University Blvd, Tuscaloosa, al, US, 35487-0166
Last Update: 02/04/2026
The University of Alabama is a student-centered research university and an academic community committed to enhancing the quality of life for all through breakthrough research. Founded in 1831 as Alabama's first public college, The University of Alabama is dedicated to...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
University of Missouri St. Louis College of Business Administration
The University of Alabama
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for University of Missouri St. Louis College of Business Administration in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for The University of Alabama in 2026.
Incident History - University of Missouri St. Louis College of Business Administration (X = Date, Y = Severity)
University of Missouri St. Louis College of Business Administration cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - The University of Alabama (X = Date, Y = Severity)
The University of Alabama cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
University of Missouri St. Louis College of Business Administration
The University of Alabama
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in ealpha072 Student-Management-System up to 01451bd7a2f58cdda07bd0b86e3967582e3ecd08. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file admin/config.php of the component Administrative Backend. Such manipulation leads to improper authentication. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. This product utilizes a rolling release system for continuous delivery, and as such, version information for affected or updated releases is not disclosed. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A vulnerability was determined in sgl-project SGLang up to 0.5.11. Affected by this vulnerability is the function data_hash of the component Cache Handler. This manipulation causes denial of service. The attack is restricted to local execution. A high degree of complexity is needed for the attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.
Active IQ OneCollect version 2.7.3 contains hard-coded credentials that could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized AutoSupport operations.
Active IQ Config Advisor version 6.7.3 contains hard-coded credentials that could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized AutoSupport operations.
A vulnerability was found in crmeb crmeb_java 1.4. Affected is the function RestTemplate.getForEntity of the file crmeb-common/src/main/java/com/zbkj/common/utils/RestTemplateUtil.java of the component base64 Qrcode Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.