Comparison Overview

University of Maryland

VS

University of California

University of Maryland

University of Maryland, College Park, MD, US, 20742
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

As the State's flagship, the University of Maryland (UMD) strives to bring students deeply into the process of discovery, innovation and entrepreneurship. Whenever possible, hands-on research complements classroom instruction. Interdisciplinary collaborations facilitate the understanding of complex problems like cybersecurity and climate change, and international study and diversity help our graduates become global citizens. Its location inside Washington, D.C.'s Beltway, along with its own Metro stop, gives students numerous opportunities to work with neighboring federal agencies and labs, think tanks and foreign organizations.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 21,312
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

University of California

1111 Franklin St, Oakland, California, 94607, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18

No other university does as much for so many as the University of California. For almost 150 years, the University of California has educated the brightest minds and helped California become a beacon of innovation. Our campuses routinely are ranked among the best in the world. But our reach extends beyond campus borders. Our people connect the dots, exchange ideas, make advancements and unlock the secrets and mysteries of the universe every day. They engage local governments and underserved schools, save lives and improve health, protect the environment and push the boundaries of space. And it adds up to an immense direct impact on the economy. UC supports 430,000 jobs and contributes over $46 billion to the California economy each year.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 154,345
Subsidiaries: 59
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
13
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-maryland.jpeg
University of Maryland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-california.jpeg
University of California
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of Maryland
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of California
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Maryland in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of California in 2026.

Incident History — University of Maryland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Maryland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — University of California (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of California cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-maryland.jpeg
University of Maryland
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2021
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-california.jpeg
University of California
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

University of California company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to University of Maryland company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

University of California company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to University of Maryland company.

In the current year, University of California company and University of Maryland company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Both University of California company and University of Maryland company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.

University of California company has disclosed at least one data breach, while University of Maryland company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither University of California company nor University of Maryland company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither University of Maryland company nor University of California company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University of Maryland nor University of California holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

University of California company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to University of Maryland company.

University of California company employs more people globally than University of Maryland company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither University of Maryland nor University of California holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of Maryland nor University of California holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of Maryland nor University of California holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of Maryland nor University of California holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of Maryland nor University of California holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of Maryland nor University of California holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H