University-of-georgia vs Ntusg - Cyber Risk Comparison & Security Rating

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Comparison Overview

The University of Georgia

Nanyang Technological University Singapore

The University of Georgia

Administration Building, Athens, GA, US, 30602

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile

Between 800 and 849

http://uga.edu

802/1000Good

The University of Georgia, a land-grant and sea-grant university with state-wide commitments and responsibilities, is the state's flagship institution of higher education. It is also the state's oldest, most comprehensive and most diversified institution of higher educa...

NAICS:6113

NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools

Employees:17,275

Subsidiaries:6

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Nanyang Technological University Singapore

50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore, Singapore, 639798, SG

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile

Between 800 and 849

http://www.ntu.edu.sg/

801/1000Good

A research-intensive public university, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) has 33,000 undergraduate and postgraduate students in the Engineering, Business, Science, Medicine, Humanities, Arts, & Social Sciences, and Graduate colleges. NTU is ...

NAICS:6113

NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools

Employees:11,486

Subsidiaries:1

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category

The University of Georgia

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Nanyang Technological University Singapore

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The University of Georgia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nanyang Technological University Singapore in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - The University of Georgia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The University of Georgia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Nanyang Technological University Singapore (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nanyang Technological University Singapore cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...

The University of Georgia

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

Nanyang Technological University Singapore

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between The University of Georgia company and Nanyang Technological University Singapore company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?

Between The University of Georgia company and Nanyang Technological University Singapore company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?

Between The University of Georgia company and Nanyang Technological University Singapore company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?

Between The University of Georgia company and Nanyang Technological University Singapore company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?

Between The University of Georgia company and Nanyang Technological University Singapore company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?

Between The University of Georgia company and Nanyang Technological University Singapore company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?

Between The University of Georgia company and Nanyang Technological University Singapore company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?

Between The University of Georgia company and Nanyang Technological University Singapore company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?

Between The University of Georgia company and Nanyang Technological University Singapore company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?

Between The University of Georgia company and Nanyang Technological University Singapore company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?

Between The University of Georgia company and Nanyang Technological University Singapore company, which one has the largest number of employees ?

Between The University of Georgia and Nanyang Technological University Singapore, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?

Between The University of Georgia and Nanyang Technological University Singapore, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?

Which company is ISO 27001 certified - The University of Georgia or Nanyang Technological University Singapore ?

Which company is PCI DSS compliant - The University of Georgia or Nanyang Technological University Singapore ?

Between The University of Georgia and Nanyang Technological University Singapore, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?

Between The University of Georgia and Nanyang Technological University Singapore, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66473

SUMMARY

Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in Xendit Payment <= 7.1.0 versions.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-07-27

UPDATED

Date2026-07-27

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)

CVSS3

Base Score: 7.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

3.9

REFERENCES

https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/woo-xendit-virtual-accounts/vulnerability/wordpress-xendit-payment-plugin-7-1-0-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve

CVE-2026-65448

SUMMARY

Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in Anti Spam and list cleaner – AcyChecker <= 1.8.1 versions.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-07-27

UPDATED

Date2026-07-27

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)

CVSS3

Base Score: 6.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

IMPACT SCORE

3.7

EXPLOITABILITY

2.3

REFERENCES

https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/acychecker/vulnerability/wordpress-anti-spam-and-list-cleaner-acychecker-plugin-1-8-1-cross-site-scripting-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve

CVE-2026-65447

SUMMARY

Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in Contest Gallery <= 30.0.6 versions.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-07-27

UPDATED

Date2026-07-27

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)

CVSS3

Base Score: 7.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

IMPACT SCORE

3.7

EXPLOITABILITY

2.8

REFERENCES

https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/contest-gallery/vulnerability/wordpress-contest-gallery-plugin-30-0-6-cross-site-scripting-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve

CVE-2026-65446

SUMMARY

Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in Kali Forms <= 2.4.18 versions.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-07-27

UPDATED

Date2026-07-27

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)

CVSS3

Base Score: 7.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

IMPACT SCORE

3.7

EXPLOITABILITY

2.8

REFERENCES

https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/kali-forms/vulnerability/wordpress-kali-forms-plugin-2-4-18-cross-site-scripting-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve

CVE-2026-65445

SUMMARY

Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in Ad Invalid Click Protector (AICP) <= 1.3.0 versions.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-07-27

UPDATED

Date2026-07-27

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)

CVSS3

Base Score: 6.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

IMPACT SCORE

2.5

EXPLOITABILITY

3.9

REFERENCES

https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/ad-invalid-click-protector/vulnerability/wordpress-ad-invalid-click-protector-aicp-plugin-1-3-0-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve