Comparison Overview

University of Amsterdam

VS

CNRS

University of Amsterdam

Spui 21, Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NL, 1012 WX
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://http://www.uva.nl

The University of Amsterdam is one of the largest comprehensive universities in Europe. With some 44,000 students, 6,000 staff, 3,000 PhD candidates, and an annual budget of more than 850 million euros, it is also one of Amsterdam’s biggest employers. There is an inseparable link between the university and its host city. The freedom and creativity with which Amsterdam has long been associated have worked their way into the fabric of the university. This is a place where individuality, authenticity and diversity are celebrated as sources of stimulation, inspiration and innovation. Professional and personal development, challenges and collaboration are undertaken in a versatile and multidimensional (inter)national ecosystem with leading stakeholders. Staff at the UvA make a meaningful contribution to uncovering solutions to some of the world’s most significant problems and to developing the next generation of talent.

NAICS: 5417
NAICS Definition: Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees: 11,136
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

CNRS

3 rue Michel-Ange, Paris, 75016, FR
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
https://www.cnrs.fr/

The French National Centre for Scientific Research is among the world's leading research institutions. Its scientists explore the living world, matter, the Universe, and the functioning of human societies in order to meet the major challenges of today and tomorrow. Internationally recognised for the excellence of its scientific research, the CNRS is a reference in the world of research and development, as well as for the general public.

NAICS: 5417
NAICS Definition: Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees: 22,365
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-amsterdam.jpeg
University of Amsterdam
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cnrs.jpeg
CNRS
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of Amsterdam
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CNRS
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Amsterdam in 2026.

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CNRS in 2026.

Incident History — University of Amsterdam (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Amsterdam cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CNRS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CNRS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-amsterdam.jpeg
University of Amsterdam
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cnrs.jpeg
CNRS
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CNRS company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to University of Amsterdam company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CNRS company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to University of Amsterdam company.

In the current year, CNRS company and University of Amsterdam company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CNRS company nor University of Amsterdam company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CNRS company nor University of Amsterdam company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CNRS company nor University of Amsterdam company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither University of Amsterdam company nor CNRS company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University of Amsterdam nor CNRS holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

University of Amsterdam company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to CNRS company.

CNRS company employs more people globally than University of Amsterdam company, reflecting its scale as a Research Services.

Neither University of Amsterdam nor CNRS holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of Amsterdam nor CNRS holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of Amsterdam nor CNRS holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of Amsterdam nor CNRS holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of Amsterdam nor CNRS holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of Amsterdam nor CNRS holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References