Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

University Hospitals VenturesUniversity Hospitals Ventures
VS
LabcorpLabcorp
University Hospitals Ventures

University Hospitals Ventures

11100 Euclid Ave, Lakeside 1570, Cleveland, Ohio, US, 44106

Last Update: 25/01/2026

View Profile
759/1000Fair

UH Ventures is solving for the future of University Hospitals and the future of healthcare. We identify, develop, and deploy the most disruptive and creative innovations that originate from within University Hospitals as well as from organizations all over the world.

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:21
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Labcorp

Labcorp

531 South Spring Street, Burlington, 27215, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.labcorp.com
778/1000Fair

Clear and confident health care decisions begin with questions. At Labcorp, we’re constantly in pursuit of answers. As a global leader of innovative and comprehensive laboratory services, we help doctors, hospitals, pharmaceutical companies, researchers and patients m...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:42,956
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
University Hospitals Ventures

University Hospitals Ventures

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Labcorp

Labcorp

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University Hospitals Ventures in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Labcorp in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - University Hospitals Ventures (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University Hospitals Ventures cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Labcorp (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Labcorp cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
University Hospitals Ventures

University Hospitals Ventures

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Labcorp

Labcorp

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LAB156072625
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
LAB2291122

FAQ

Between University Hospitals Ventures company and Labcorp company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between University Hospitals Ventures company and Labcorp company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between University Hospitals Ventures company and Labcorp company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between University Hospitals Ventures company and Labcorp company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between University Hospitals Ventures company and Labcorp company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between University Hospitals Ventures company and Labcorp company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between University Hospitals Ventures company and Labcorp company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between University Hospitals Ventures company and Labcorp company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between University Hospitals Ventures company and Labcorp company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between University Hospitals Ventures company and Labcorp company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between University Hospitals Ventures company and Labcorp company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between University Hospitals Ventures and Labcorp, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between University Hospitals Ventures and Labcorp, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - University Hospitals Ventures or Labcorp ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - University Hospitals Ventures or Labcorp ?
Between University Hospitals Ventures and Labcorp, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between University Hospitals Ventures and Labcorp, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1