Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Leuphana University of LüneburgLeuphana University of Lüneburg
VS
Temple UniversityTemple University
Leuphana University of Lüneburg

Leuphana University of Lüneburg

Universitätsallee 1, Lüneburg, Niedersachsen, DE, 21335

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.leuphana.de
778/1000Fair

Das Alumni-Netzwerk der Leuphana Universität Lüneburg ist ein stetig wachsendes Netzwerk von weit über 20.000 Mitgliedern, bestehend aus Alumni, Studierenden, Lehrenden, Forschenden, Freund*innen und Förder*innen der Leuphana. Mit über 35 Jahren Erfahrung in der Hochsc...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:1,625
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Temple University

Temple University

1801 N Broad St, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US, 19122

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.temple.edu
788/1000Fair

As the largest university in one of the nation’s most iconic cities, Temple educates diverse future leaders from across Philadelphia, the country and the world who share a common drive to learn, prepare for their careers and make a real impact. Founded as a night school...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:13,006
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Leuphana University of Lüneburg

Leuphana University of Lüneburg

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Temple University

Temple University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Leuphana University of Lüneburg in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Temple University in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Leuphana University of Lüneburg (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Leuphana University of Lüneburg cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Temple University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Temple University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Leuphana University of Lüneburg

Leuphana University of Lüneburg

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Temple University

Temple University

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
TEM203726323

FAQ

Between Leuphana University of Lüneburg company and Temple University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Leuphana University of Lüneburg company and Temple University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Leuphana University of Lüneburg company and Temple University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Leuphana University of Lüneburg company and Temple University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Leuphana University of Lüneburg company and Temple University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Leuphana University of Lüneburg company and Temple University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Leuphana University of Lüneburg company and Temple University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Leuphana University of Lüneburg company and Temple University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Leuphana University of Lüneburg company and Temple University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Leuphana University of Lüneburg company and Temple University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Leuphana University of Lüneburg company and Temple University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Leuphana University of Lüneburg and Temple University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Leuphana University of Lüneburg and Temple University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Leuphana University of Lüneburg or Temple University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Leuphana University of Lüneburg or Temple University ?
Between Leuphana University of Lüneburg and Temple University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Leuphana University of Lüneburg and Temple University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2