Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Universitätsklinikum UlmUniversitätsklinikum Ulm
VS
Cincinnati Children'sCincinnati Children's
Universitätsklinikum Ulm

Universitätsklinikum Ulm

Albert-Einstein-Allee 29, Ulm, Baden-Württemberg, DE, 89081

Last Update: 22/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.uniklinik-ulm.de
767/1000Fair

Im Universitätsklinikum Ulm werden jährlich rund 50.000 Patient*innen stationär behandelt. Hinzu kommen knapp 300.000 ambulante Quartalsfälle. Über 7.000 Mitarbeiter*innen leisten an den Standorten des Klinikums universitäre Spitzenmedizin. Mit 29 Kliniken und 16 Instit...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:1,417
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Cincinnati Children's

Cincinnati Children's

US

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
785/1000Fair

Cincinnati Children’s, a nonprofit academic medical center established in 1883, offers services from well-child care to treatment for the most rare and complex conditions. It is the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine and trains ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:16,334
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Universitätsklinikum Ulm

Universitätsklinikum Ulm

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Cincinnati Children's

Cincinnati Children's

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Universitätsklinikum Ulm in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cincinnati Children's in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Universitätsklinikum Ulm (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Universitätsklinikum Ulm cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Cincinnati Children's (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cincinnati Children's cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Universitätsklinikum Ulm

Universitätsklinikum Ulm

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Cincinnati Children's

Cincinnati Children's

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Universitätsklinikum Ulm company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Universitätsklinikum Ulm company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Universitätsklinikum Ulm company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Universitätsklinikum Ulm company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Universitätsklinikum Ulm company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Universitätsklinikum Ulm company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Universitätsklinikum Ulm company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Universitätsklinikum Ulm company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Universitätsklinikum Ulm company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Universitätsklinikum Ulm company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Universitätsklinikum Ulm company and Cincinnati Children's company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Universitätsklinikum Ulm and Cincinnati Children's, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Universitätsklinikum Ulm and Cincinnati Children's, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Universitätsklinikum Ulm or Cincinnati Children's ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Universitätsklinikum Ulm or Cincinnati Children's ?
Between Universitätsklinikum Ulm and Cincinnati Children's, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Universitätsklinikum Ulm and Cincinnati Children's, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1