Comparison Overview
Universal Alloy Corporation
Universal Alloy Corporation
Strada Principala, Nr. 244A, Dumbrăviţa, 437277, RO
Last Update: 26/02/2026
UAC, as a part of Montana Aerospace, supplies aircraft manufacturers and their subcontractors worldwide and has served the aircraft industry for over four decades. We specialize in 2000- and 7000-series alloys, but offer a full range of alloys and tempers that can be ta...
Airbus
BP 90112, Blagnac Cedex, FR, 31703
Last Update: 12/09/2026
Airbus pioneers sustainable aerospace for a safe and united world. The Company constantly innovates to provide efficient and technologically-advanced solutions in aerospace, defence, and connected services. In commercial aircraft, Airbus designs and manufactures modern...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Universal Alloy Corporation
Airbus
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Universal Alloy Corporation in 2026.
Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Airbus in 2026.
Incident History - Universal Alloy Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Universal Alloy Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Airbus (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Airbus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Universal Alloy Corporation
Airbus
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.