Comparison Overview
United States Marshals Service

United States Marshals Service
1215 S Clark St, Arlington, 22202, US
Last Update: 04/04/2026
Approximately 4,000 U.S. Marshals and Deputy U.S. Marshals form the backbone of the United States Marshals Service, an agency that has served the United States since 1789. The U.S. Marshals Service serves as the enforcement arm of the federal courts and is involved in v...

SAPS
ZA
Last Update: 08/09/2026
Policing in South Africa. I am attached to the newly formed Directorate for Priority Crime Investigations. Formally I was attached to the Detecitve Service and have been conduction investigations for over 25 years. I have also been attached to the National Inspectorate ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

United States Marshals Service







SAPS






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for United States Marshals Service in 2026.
Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Avg (This Year)
SAPS has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - United States Marshals Service (X = Date, Y = Severity)
United States Marshals Service cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - SAPS (X = Date, Y = Severity)
SAPS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

United States Marshals Service

SAPS
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.