Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

United States Marshals ServiceUnited States Marshals Service
VS
Swedish Police AuthoritySwedish Police Authority
United States Marshals Service

United States Marshals Service

1215 S Clark St, Arlington, 22202, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
614/1000Poor

Approximately 4,000 U.S. Marshals and Deputy U.S. Marshals form the backbone of the United States Marshals Service, an agency that has served the United States since 1789. The U.S. Marshals Service serves as the enforcement arm of the federal courts and is involved in v...

NAICS:92212
NAICS Definition:Police Protection
Employees:1,609
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Swedish Police Authority

Swedish Police Authority

Polhemsgatan , Stockholm, 10226, SE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://polisen.se/
785/1000Fair

Vi gör hela Sverige tryggt och säkert! Att arbeta inom polisen är ett av de finaste uppdrag man kan ha. Du bidrar till samhället genom att göra hela Sverige tryggt och säkert. Oavsett om du jobbar i en civil roll eller som polis, är möjligheterna att växa med en större...

NAICS:92212
NAICS Definition:Police Protection
Employees:10,579
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
United States Marshals Service

United States Marshals Service

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Swedish Police Authority

Swedish Police Authority

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for United States Marshals Service in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swedish Police Authority in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - United States Marshals Service (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United States Marshals Service cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Swedish Police Authority (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swedish Police Authority cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
United States Marshals Service

United States Marshals Service

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
UNI1769676090
🔒 Incident : Breach
UNI1353301222
Swedish Police Authority

Swedish Police Authority

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between United States Marshals Service company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between United States Marshals Service company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between United States Marshals Service company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between United States Marshals Service company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between United States Marshals Service company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between United States Marshals Service company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between United States Marshals Service company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between United States Marshals Service company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between United States Marshals Service company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between United States Marshals Service company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between United States Marshals Service company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between United States Marshals Service and Swedish Police Authority, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between United States Marshals Service and Swedish Police Authority, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - United States Marshals Service or Swedish Police Authority ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - United States Marshals Service or Swedish Police Authority ?
Between United States Marshals Service and Swedish Police Authority, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between United States Marshals Service and Swedish Police Authority, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1