ISO 27001 Certificate
SOC 1 Type I Certificate
SOC 2 Type II Certificate
PCI DSS
HIPAA
RGPD
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
ISOSOC2 Type 1SOC2 Type 2PCI DSSHIPAAGDPR

The federal government of the United States (U.S. federal government) is the national government of the United States, a federal republic in North America, composed of 50 states, a federal district, five major self-governing territories and several island possessions. The federal government is composed of three distinct branches: legislative, executive and judicial, whose powers are vested by the U.S. Constitution in the Congress, the president and the federal courts, respectively. The powers and duties of these branches are further defined by acts of Congress, including the creation of executive departments and courts inferior to the Supreme Court.

United States Federal Government A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

USFG

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

united-states-federal-government

Employees number:

3,753

Number of followers:

8,990

NAICS:

92

Industry Type:

Government Administration

Homepage:

usa.gov

IP Addresses:

0

Company ID:

UNI_2180069

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreUSFG Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 700 and 749

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-states-federal-government.jpeg
USFG Government Administration
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
globalscoreUSFG Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-states-federal-government.jpeg
USFG Government Administration
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

USFG Company CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents
2
Attack Types
1
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenBlog DetailsIncident DetailsView
U.S. Federal Government (Representative Moolenaar's office and associated entities)Cyber Attack6029/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: APT41, a state-sponsored advanced persistent threat group linked to China, impersonated **Representative Moolenaar** via a **spear-phishing email** targeting trade groups and law firms during **U.S.-China trade negotiations**. The attack involved a **malicious draft proposal attachment** soliciting input, exploiting recipients' trust in Moolenaar’s authority to gather **strategic insights, policy feedback, and potentially sensitive trade-related intelligence**. The emotional manipulation—leveraging flattery and perceived exclusivity—heightened the attack’s credibility. While no explicit data breach (e.g., financial or PII theft) was confirmed, the operation aimed to **compromise confidential trade discussions**, undermining U.S. negotiation leverage. The incident underscored vulnerabilities in **federal email security**, particularly against **AI-enhanced impersonation attacks**, and highlighted gaps in **BOD 18-01 compliance** (SPF/DKIM/DMARC) and **zero-trust adoption**. The attack’s timing and targeting of high-profile stakeholders elevated risks of **geopolitical espionage** and **reputational damage** to U.S. trade policy integrity.

United States Federal GovernmentCyber Attack100511/2022
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization's existence

Description: The U.S. Cybersecurity Infrastructure and Security Agency discovered a potential cyberattack on the U.S. Federal network, in which attackers have taken control of the organization's DC and used cryptominers and credential harvesters. The attack, according to CISA, was started by hackers supported by the Iranian government who installed the XMRig crypto mining software, moved laterally to the domain controller (DC), stole passwords, and then placed Ngrok reverse proxies on a number of sites to ensure persistence. With the aid of EINSTEIN, an intrusion detection system deployed across the FCEB, CISA conducts a routine investigation and suspected harmful APT activity on the FCEB network (IDS).

U.S. Federal Government (Representative Moolenaar's office and associated entities)
Cyber Attack
Severity: 60
Impact: 2
Seen: 9/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: APT41, a state-sponsored advanced persistent threat group linked to China, impersonated **Representative Moolenaar** via a **spear-phishing email** targeting trade groups and law firms during **U.S.-China trade negotiations**. The attack involved a **malicious draft proposal attachment** soliciting input, exploiting recipients' trust in Moolenaar’s authority to gather **strategic insights, policy feedback, and potentially sensitive trade-related intelligence**. The emotional manipulation—leveraging flattery and perceived exclusivity—heightened the attack’s credibility. While no explicit data breach (e.g., financial or PII theft) was confirmed, the operation aimed to **compromise confidential trade discussions**, undermining U.S. negotiation leverage. The incident underscored vulnerabilities in **federal email security**, particularly against **AI-enhanced impersonation attacks**, and highlighted gaps in **BOD 18-01 compliance** (SPF/DKIM/DMARC) and **zero-trust adoption**. The attack’s timing and targeting of high-profile stakeholders elevated risks of **geopolitical espionage** and **reputational damage** to U.S. trade policy integrity.

United States Federal Government
Cyber Attack
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 11/2022
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence

Description: The U.S. Cybersecurity Infrastructure and Security Agency discovered a potential cyberattack on the U.S. Federal network, in which attackers have taken control of the organization's DC and used cryptominers and credential harvesters. The attack, according to CISA, was started by hackers supported by the Iranian government who installed the XMRig crypto mining software, moved laterally to the domain controller (DC), stole passwords, and then placed Ngrok reverse proxies on a number of sites to ensure persistence. With the aid of EINSTEIN, an intrusion detection system deployed across the FCEB, CISA conducts a routine investigation and suspected harmful APT activity on the FCEB network (IDS).

Ailogo

USFG Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
Incident Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan
statics

Underwriter Stats for USFG

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

United States Federal Government has 51.52% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

United States Federal Government has 56.25% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident Types USFG vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

United States Federal Government reported 1 incidents this year: 1 cyber attacks, 0 ransomware, 0 vulnerabilities, 0 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.

Incident History — USFG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

USFG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

USFG Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

The federal government of the United States (U.S. federal government) is the national government of the United States, a federal republic in North America, composed of 50 states, a federal district, five major self-governing territories and several island possessions. The federal government is composed of three distinct branches: legislative, executive and judicial, whose powers are vested by the U.S. Constitution in the Congress, the president and the federal courts, respectively. The powers and duties of these branches are further defined by acts of Congress, including the creation of executive departments and courts inferior to the Supreme Court.

Loading...
similarCompanies

USFG Similar Companies

Government of Alberta

Work with the Alberta government to build a stronger province for current and future generations. We offer diverse and rewarding employment opportunities in an environment that encourages continuous learning and career growth. We are one of the largest employers in Alberta with over 27,000 empl

Ministero dell'Agricoltura, della Sovranità alimentare e delle Foreste

Il Ministero dell'Agricoltura, della Sovranità alimentare e delle Foreste (Masaf) si occupa dell'elaborazione e del coordinamento delle linee politiche agricole, agroalimentari, forestali, della pesca e dell’ippica a livello nazionale e internazionale. Rappresenta l'Italia in sede europea nelle cont

General Services Administration (GSA) is an independent agency of the United States government established in 1949 to help manage and support the basic functioning of federal agencies. Our organization includes the Public Buildings Service (PBS), Federal Acquisition Service (FAS), and a variety of S

Social Security Administration

Social Security provides financial protection for our nation’s people, supporting more than 64 million individuals and families. With retirement, disability, and survivors benefits, Social Security is one of the most successful anti-poverty programs in our nation's history. We are there throughout

Op vrijwel alle werkterreinen en functieniveaus biedt de Rijksoverheid leuke en boeiende banen. Vacatures zijn bovendien in heel Nederland te vinden. Waar voor jou precies de mogelijkheden liggen hangt onder andere samen met je vooropleiding. Zowel met een mbo- of hbo-diploma als met een universitai

Ministry of Environment and Urbanism

MINISTRY of ENVIRONMENT and URBANISM (MEU) MAIN SERVICE UNITS ================== 1) General Directorate of Construction Works 2) General Directorate of Spatial Planning 3) General Directorate of Environmental Management 4) General Directorate of EIA, Permits and Control 5) General Directo

Västra Götalandsregionen

Region Västra Götaland is governed by democratically elected politicians and with just over 50,000 employees is one of Sweden’s biggest employers. It is tasked with offering good healthcare and dental care and providing the prerequisites for good public health, a rich cultural life, a good enviro

US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) mission is to protect human health and the environment. EPA works to ensure that: - Americans have clean air, land and water; - National efforts to reduce environmental risks are based on the best available scientific information; - Federal laws protecti

Transportation Security Administration (TSA)

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is a component agency of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), committed to securing the nation’s transportation systems to ensure safe and efficient travel for all. Our mission is to protect the American people by preventing threats and dis

newsone

USFG CyberSecurity News

November 26, 2025 07:00 AM
U.S. cybersecurity policy under Trump

U.S. cybersecurity under the Trump administration focuses on foreign threats, but funding cuts may create vulnerabilities.

November 13, 2025 08:00 AM
Government funding bill temporarily revives cybersecurity information-sharing law

The spending legislation passed by Congress will reauthorize the CISA 2015 program through the end of January.

November 12, 2025 08:00 AM
US Congress moves to restore CISA 2015, closing cybersecurity gaps for critical infrastructure

U.S. lawmakers included the extension of a key cyberthreat sharing law and cyber grant program in the continuing resolution to reopen the...

November 10, 2025 08:00 AM
Government Shutdown Could End Soon, But Cybersecurity Risks Live On

After 40 days, the longest government shutdown in U.S. history may finally be ending. As Washington reopens, America faces risks to...

November 10, 2025 08:00 AM
CISA, FCEA funding set to resume as shutdown nears its end

The US Senate voted on Sunday to advance a short-term funding bill for the federal government, moving the country closer to ending its...

November 07, 2025 08:00 AM
Trump budget cuts, agency gutting, leave Americans and economy at greater risk of being hacked, experts warn

The Trump administration's budget cuts and government agency gutting, including at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency (CISA),...

October 31, 2025 07:00 AM
Trump admin begins developing new cybersecurity strategy

Sean Cairncross, the national cyber director, said he's looking to improve U.S. cyber strategy efforts by working with the private sector.

October 24, 2025 07:00 AM
Shutdown Sparks 85% Increase in US Government Cyberattacks

Attackers are pouncing on financially strapped US government agencies and employees. And the effects of this period might be felt for a long...

October 23, 2025 07:00 AM
Kristi Noem pledged to boost the nation’s cybersecurity. She gutted it instead.

The cyber community fears that the administration's continuous cuts have weakened our cyber defenses. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi...

faq

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.

USFG CyberSecurity History Information

Official Website of United States Federal Government

The official website of United States Federal Government is https://www.usa.gov.

United States Federal Government’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score

According to Rankiteo, United States Federal Government’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 737, reflecting their Moderate security posture.

How many security badges does United States Federal Government’ have ?

According to Rankiteo, United States Federal Government currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Does United States Federal Government have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, United States Federal Government is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does United States Federal Government have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, United States Federal Government does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does United States Federal Government comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, United States Federal Government is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does United States Federal Government have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, United States Federal Government does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does United States Federal Government comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, United States Federal Government is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does United States Federal Government have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,United States Federal Government is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Industry Classification of United States Federal Government

United States Federal Government operates primarily in the Government Administration industry.

Number of Employees at United States Federal Government

United States Federal Government employs approximately 3,753 people worldwide.

Subsidiaries Owned by United States Federal Government

United States Federal Government presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

United States Federal Government’s LinkedIn Followers

United States Federal Government’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 8,990 followers.

NAICS Classification of United States Federal Government

United States Federal Government is classified under the NAICS code 92, which corresponds to Public Administration.

United States Federal Government’s Presence on Crunchbase

No, United States Federal Government does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

United States Federal Government’s Presence on LinkedIn

Yes, United States Federal Government maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/united-states-federal-government.

Cybersecurity Incidents Involving United States Federal Government

As of December 04, 2025, Rankiteo reports that United States Federal Government has experienced 2 cybersecurity incidents.

Number of Peer and Competitor Companies

United States Federal Government has an estimated 11,337 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at United States Federal Government ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Cyber Attack.

How does United States Federal Government detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an communication strategy with public disclosure via interview, communication strategy with awareness of email vulnerabilities, and enhanced monitoring with advocacy for ai-driven email security solutions (e.g., abnormal ai)..

Incident Details

Can you provide details on each incident ?

Incident : Cyberattack

Title: U.S. Federal Network Cyberattack

Description: The U.S. Cybersecurity Infrastructure and Security Agency (CISA) discovered a potential cyberattack on the U.S. Federal network, in which attackers have taken control of the organization's DC and used cryptominers and credential harvesters.

Type: Cyberattack

Attack Vector: CryptominersCredential Harvesters

Threat Actor: Iranian government-supported hackers

Motivation: Cryptocurrency miningCredential theft

Incident : Phishing

Title: APT41 Impersonation Attack Targeting Representative Moolenaar During U.S.-China Trade Talks

Description: APT41 actors impersonated Representative Moolenaar via email, targeting trade groups and law firms during U.S.-China trade talks. The attack involved a malicious draft proposal attachment soliciting input, exploiting the emotional appeal of receiving a personal request from a high-profile political figure. The incident highlights the ongoing vulnerability of email as an attack vector, especially in government contexts where public engagement is critical. The attack leveraged social engineering and the perceived legitimacy of the sender to gather intelligence on trade negotiations.

Type: Phishing

Attack Vector: Email SpoofingMalicious Attachment (Draft Proposal)Emotional Manipulation

Vulnerability Exploited: Human Trust in Email CommunicationLack of Real-Time Email AuthenticationUse of Non-Official Communication Channels

Threat Actor: APT41 (Advanced Persistent Threat Group 41)

Motivation: EspionageIntelligence Gathering on U.S.-China Trade TalksExploiting Geopolitical Tensions

What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Cyber Attack.

How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Email (Spoofed Sender: Representative Moolenaar).

Impact of the Incidents

What was the impact of each incident ?

Incident : Cyberattack UNI1045221122

Systems Affected: Domain Controller (DC)

Incident : Phishing UNI1153111110725

Data Compromised: Potential intelligence on trade negotiations, Recipient input/feedback on draft proposals

Operational Impact: Potential Compromise of Trade StrategyErosion of Trust in Email Communications

Brand Reputation Impact: Undermined Trust in Government Email CommunicationsHighlighted Vulnerabilities in Federal Email Security

What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Strategic Trade Negotiation Insights, Stakeholder Feedback On Draft Proposals and .

Which entities were affected by each incident ?

Incident : Cyberattack UNI1045221122

Entity Name: U.S. Federal Network

Entity Type: Government

Industry: Public Administration

Location: United States

Incident : Phishing UNI1153111110725

Entity Name: Representative John Moolenaar (Impersonated)

Entity Type: Government Official

Industry: Public Sector / Government

Location: United States

Incident : Phishing UNI1153111110725

Entity Name: Unspecified Trade Groups

Entity Type: Private Sector Organizations

Industry: Trade, Policy

Incident : Phishing UNI1153111110725

Entity Name: Unspecified Law Firms

Entity Type: Private Sector Organizations

Industry: Legal

Response to the Incidents

What measures were taken in response to each incident ?

Incident : Phishing UNI1153111110725

Communication Strategy: Public Disclosure via InterviewAwareness of Email Vulnerabilities

Enhanced Monitoring: Advocacy for AI-Driven Email Security Solutions (e.g., Abnormal AI)

Data Breach Information

What type of data was compromised in each breach ?

Incident : Phishing UNI1153111110725

Type of Data Compromised: Strategic trade negotiation insights, Stakeholder feedback on draft proposals

Sensitivity of Data: High (Geopolitical and Economic Sensitivity)

Data Exfiltration: Likely (Intelligence Gathering)

File Types Exposed: Draft Proposal Documents (Malicious Attachment)

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What lessons were learned from each incident ?

Incident : Phishing UNI1153111110725

Lessons Learned: Email remains the 'front door' to federal systems due to the necessity of public engagement, making it a persistent attack vector., Social engineering tactics, including emotional appeals (e.g., flattery, perceived exclusivity), are highly effective in bypassing technical defenses., Non-official communication channels (e.g., personal email, texting) introduce additional risks by circumventing enterprise security controls., Current federal email security policies (e.g., BOD 18-01) are outdated and do not account for AI-driven threats or modern defensive technologies., Human vigilance alone is insufficient; AI and automation are critical for scaling email security at the pace of modern threats.

What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?

Incident : Phishing UNI1153111110725

Recommendations: Update federal email security policies (e.g., BOD 18-01) to incorporate AI and advanced technologies for real-time threat detection and authentication (beyond SPF, DKIM, DMARC)., Mandate the use of official communication channels for government business to leverage enterprise-grade security and ensure compliance with public record laws., Enhance cybersecurity training to include scenario-based exercises for impersonation attacks, emphasizing emotional manipulation and non-technical red flags., Deploy AI-driven email security solutions (e.g., Abnormal AI) to automate the detection of sophisticated phishing and impersonation attempts., Reevaluate zero-trust strategies (e.g., M-22-09) to integrate emerging technologies that address evolving threat vectors like AI-generated voice/spoofing attacks., Promote cross-agency collaboration (OMB, CISA, State Department, etc.) to share threat intelligence and standardize defensive measures against APT groups like APT41.Update federal email security policies (e.g., BOD 18-01) to incorporate AI and advanced technologies for real-time threat detection and authentication (beyond SPF, DKIM, DMARC)., Mandate the use of official communication channels for government business to leverage enterprise-grade security and ensure compliance with public record laws., Enhance cybersecurity training to include scenario-based exercises for impersonation attacks, emphasizing emotional manipulation and non-technical red flags., Deploy AI-driven email security solutions (e.g., Abnormal AI) to automate the detection of sophisticated phishing and impersonation attempts., Reevaluate zero-trust strategies (e.g., M-22-09) to integrate emerging technologies that address evolving threat vectors like AI-generated voice/spoofing attacks., Promote cross-agency collaboration (OMB, CISA, State Department, etc.) to share threat intelligence and standardize defensive measures against APT groups like APT41.Update federal email security policies (e.g., BOD 18-01) to incorporate AI and advanced technologies for real-time threat detection and authentication (beyond SPF, DKIM, DMARC)., Mandate the use of official communication channels for government business to leverage enterprise-grade security and ensure compliance with public record laws., Enhance cybersecurity training to include scenario-based exercises for impersonation attacks, emphasizing emotional manipulation and non-technical red flags., Deploy AI-driven email security solutions (e.g., Abnormal AI) to automate the detection of sophisticated phishing and impersonation attempts., Reevaluate zero-trust strategies (e.g., M-22-09) to integrate emerging technologies that address evolving threat vectors like AI-generated voice/spoofing attacks., Promote cross-agency collaboration (OMB, CISA, State Department, etc.) to share threat intelligence and standardize defensive measures against APT groups like APT41.Update federal email security policies (e.g., BOD 18-01) to incorporate AI and advanced technologies for real-time threat detection and authentication (beyond SPF, DKIM, DMARC)., Mandate the use of official communication channels for government business to leverage enterprise-grade security and ensure compliance with public record laws., Enhance cybersecurity training to include scenario-based exercises for impersonation attacks, emphasizing emotional manipulation and non-technical red flags., Deploy AI-driven email security solutions (e.g., Abnormal AI) to automate the detection of sophisticated phishing and impersonation attempts., Reevaluate zero-trust strategies (e.g., M-22-09) to integrate emerging technologies that address evolving threat vectors like AI-generated voice/spoofing attacks., Promote cross-agency collaboration (OMB, CISA, State Department, etc.) to share threat intelligence and standardize defensive measures against APT groups like APT41.Update federal email security policies (e.g., BOD 18-01) to incorporate AI and advanced technologies for real-time threat detection and authentication (beyond SPF, DKIM, DMARC)., Mandate the use of official communication channels for government business to leverage enterprise-grade security and ensure compliance with public record laws., Enhance cybersecurity training to include scenario-based exercises for impersonation attacks, emphasizing emotional manipulation and non-technical red flags., Deploy AI-driven email security solutions (e.g., Abnormal AI) to automate the detection of sophisticated phishing and impersonation attempts., Reevaluate zero-trust strategies (e.g., M-22-09) to integrate emerging technologies that address evolving threat vectors like AI-generated voice/spoofing attacks., Promote cross-agency collaboration (OMB, CISA, State Department, etc.) to share threat intelligence and standardize defensive measures against APT groups like APT41.Update federal email security policies (e.g., BOD 18-01) to incorporate AI and advanced technologies for real-time threat detection and authentication (beyond SPF, DKIM, DMARC)., Mandate the use of official communication channels for government business to leverage enterprise-grade security and ensure compliance with public record laws., Enhance cybersecurity training to include scenario-based exercises for impersonation attacks, emphasizing emotional manipulation and non-technical red flags., Deploy AI-driven email security solutions (e.g., Abnormal AI) to automate the detection of sophisticated phishing and impersonation attempts., Reevaluate zero-trust strategies (e.g., M-22-09) to integrate emerging technologies that address evolving threat vectors like AI-generated voice/spoofing attacks., Promote cross-agency collaboration (OMB, CISA, State Department, etc.) to share threat intelligence and standardize defensive measures against APT groups like APT41.

What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Email remains the 'front door' to federal systems due to the necessity of public engagement, making it a persistent attack vector.,Social engineering tactics, including emotional appeals (e.g., flattery, perceived exclusivity), are highly effective in bypassing technical defenses.,Non-official communication channels (e.g., personal email, texting) introduce additional risks by circumventing enterprise security controls.,Current federal email security policies (e.g., BOD 18-01) are outdated and do not account for AI-driven threats or modern defensive technologies.,Human vigilance alone is insufficient; AI and automation are critical for scaling email security at the pace of modern threats.

References

Where can I find more information about each incident ?

Incident : Cyberattack UNI1045221122

Source: CISA

Incident : Phishing UNI1153111110725

Source: Federal News Network Interview with Yejin Jang (Vice President of Government Affairs, Abnormal AI)

Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: CISA, and Source: Federal News Network Interview with Yejin Jang (Vice President of Government Affairs, Abnormal AI).

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?

Incident : Phishing UNI1153111110725

Investigation Status: Publicly Discussed (No Formal Investigation Details Disclosed)

How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Public Disclosure Via Interview and Awareness Of Email Vulnerabilities.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?

Incident : Phishing UNI1153111110725

Stakeholder Advisories: Agencies Advised To Prioritize Email Security Updates And Ai Integration To Counter Impersonation Threats..

Customer Advisories: Recipients of suspicious emails from government officials urged to verify sender authenticity and avoid engaging with unsolicited attachments.

What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Agencies Advised To Prioritize Email Security Updates And Ai Integration To Counter Impersonation Threats., Recipients Of Suspicious Emails From Government Officials Urged To Verify Sender Authenticity And Avoid Engaging With Unsolicited Attachments. and .

Initial Access Broker

How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?

Incident : Cyberattack UNI1045221122

Backdoors Established: ['Ngrok reverse proxies']

Incident : Phishing UNI1153111110725

Entry Point: Email (Spoofed Sender: Representative Moolenaar)

Reconnaissance Period: Likely conducted prior to U.S.-China trade talks to identify high-value targets (trade groups, law firms).

High Value Targets: Trade Groups, Law Firms, Individuals With Insight Into Trade Negotiations,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Trade Groups, Law Firms, Individuals With Insight Into Trade Negotiations,

Post-Incident Analysis

What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?

Incident : Phishing UNI1153111110725

Root Causes: Over-Reliance On Human Vigilance For Email Security In High-Stakes, Time-Sensitive Environments., Lack Of Real-Time Authentication Mechanisms For High-Profile Sender Impersonation., Policy Gaps In Addressing Ai-Enhanced Social Engineering Tactics., Cultural Norm Of Using Non-Official Channels For Sensitive Communications In Government.,

Corrective Actions: Policy Updates To Mandate Ai-Assisted Email Security And Restrict Non-Official Channel Use For Government Business., Implementation Of Behavioral Ai Tools To Flag Anomalous Email Patterns (E.G., Unexpected Attachments, Sender Spoofing)., Public-Private Partnerships To Share Apt41 Iocs (Indicators Of Compromise) And Defensive Best Practices.,

What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Advocacy For Ai-Driven Email Security Solutions (E.G., Abnormal Ai), .

What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Policy Updates To Mandate Ai-Assisted Email Security And Restrict Non-Official Channel Use For Government Business., Implementation Of Behavioral Ai Tools To Flag Anomalous Email Patterns (E.G., Unexpected Attachments, Sender Spoofing)., Public-Private Partnerships To Share Apt41 Iocs (Indicators Of Compromise) And Defensive Best Practices., .

Additional Questions

General Information

Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident were an Iranian government-supported hackers and APT41 (Advanced Persistent Threat Group 41).

Impact of the Incidents

What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Potential Intelligence on Trade Negotiations, Recipient Input/Feedback on Draft Proposals and .

What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was Domain Controller (DC).

Data Breach Information

What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Recipient Input/Feedback on Draft Proposals and Potential Intelligence on Trade Negotiations.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Human vigilance alone is insufficient; AI and automation are critical for scaling email security at the pace of modern threats.

What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Promote cross-agency collaboration (OMB, CISA, State Department, etc.) to share threat intelligence and standardize defensive measures against APT groups like APT41., Enhance cybersecurity training to include scenario-based exercises for impersonation attacks, emphasizing emotional manipulation and non-technical red flags., Update federal email security policies (e.g., BOD 18-01) to incorporate AI and advanced technologies for real-time threat detection and authentication (beyond SPF, DKIM, DMARC)., Mandate the use of official communication channels for government business to leverage enterprise-grade security and ensure compliance with public record laws., Deploy AI-driven email security solutions (e.g., Abnormal AI) to automate the detection of sophisticated phishing and impersonation attempts., Reevaluate zero-trust strategies (e.g. and M-22-09) to integrate emerging technologies that address evolving threat vectors like AI-generated voice/spoofing attacks..

References

What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are CISA, Federal News Network Interview with Yejin Jang (Vice President of Government Affairs and Abnormal AI).

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Publicly Discussed (No Formal Investigation Details Disclosed).

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Agencies advised to prioritize email security updates and AI integration to counter impersonation threats., .

What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was an Recipients of suspicious emails from government officials urged to verify sender authenticity and avoid engaging with unsolicited attachments.

Initial Access Broker

What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an Email (Spoofed Sender: Representative Moolenaar).

What was the most recent reconnaissance period for an incident ?

Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was Likely conducted prior to U.S.-China trade talks to identify high-value targets (trade groups, law firms)..

cve

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=united-states-federal-government' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

What Do We Measure ?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge