Comparison Overview

United States Air Force

VS

NAVAL GROUP

United States Air Force

550 D Street West, Suite 1, Randolph AFB, TX, US, 78150-4527
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

The mission of the United States Air Force is to fly, fight and win … in air, space and cyberspace. To achieve that mission, the Air Force has a vision of Global Vigilance, Reach and Power. That vision orbits around three core competencies: developing Airmen, technology to war fighting and integrating operations. These core competencies make our six distinctive capabilities possible. Air and Space Superiority: With it, joint forces can dominate enemy operations in all dimensions: land, sea, air and space. Global Attack: Because of technological advances, the Air Force can attack anywhere, anytime and do so quickly and with greater precision than ever before. Rapid Global Mobility: Being able to respond quickly and decisively anywhere we're needed is key to maintaining rapid global mobility. Precision Engagement: The essence lies in the ability to apply selective force against specific targets because the nature and variety of future contingencies demand both precise and reliable use of military power with minimal risk and collateral damage. Information Superiority: The ability of joint force commanders to keep pace with information and incorporate it into a campaign plan is crucial. Agile Combat Support: Deployment and sustainment are keys to successful operations and cannot be separated. Agile combat support applies to all forces, from those permanently based to contingency buildups to expeditionary

NAICS: 336414
NAICS Definition: Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 237,826
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

NAVAL GROUP

40-42 rue du docteur FInlay, None, Paris cedex 15, None, FR, 75732
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 700 and 749

As an international naval defence player, Naval Group is a partner for countries seeking to maintain control of their maritime sovereignty. Naval Group develops innovative solutions to meet its customers’ requirements. The group is present throughout the entire life cycle of vessels. It designs, produces, equips, integrates, supports and upgrades submarines and surface ships, as well as their systems and equipment, right up to the final phases of deconstruction and dismantling. Naval Group’s unique know-how in autonomous systems, underwater weapons and drones place it in pole position to become European leader in the sector. As a high-tech company, it draws on its outstanding expertise, unique design and production resources and ability to establish strategic partnerships, in particular within the framework of transfers of technology. It also provides shipyard and naval base services. Ever mindful of the issues concerning corporate social responsibility (CSR), Naval Group is a signatory to the United Nations Global Compact. Located on five continents, the group generates revenue of 4.355 billion euros and has 16,722 employees (Full-Time Equivalent average annual workforce - figures as on 31 December 2024).

NAICS: 336414
NAICS Definition: Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 11,935
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-states-air-force.jpeg
United States Air Force
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
United States Air Force
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NAVAL GROUP
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

United States Air Force has 173.97% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

NAVAL GROUP has 36.99% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — United States Air Force (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United States Air Force cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NAVAL GROUP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NAVAL GROUP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-states-air-force.jpeg
United States Air Force
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Authentication Bypass, Remote Code Execution (RCE)
Motivation: Espionage, Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Volumetric DDoS Attacks
Motivation: Geopolitical retaliation and disruption
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 03/2017
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Unprotected Backup Drive
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/naval-group.jpeg
NAVAL GROUP
Incidents

FAQ

United States Air Force company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NAVAL GROUP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

United States Air Force and NAVAL GROUP have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, United States Air Force company has reported more cyber incidents than NAVAL GROUP company.

Neither NAVAL GROUP company nor United States Air Force company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both NAVAL GROUP company and United States Air Force company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Both NAVAL GROUP company and United States Air Force company have reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks.

Neither United States Air Force company nor NAVAL GROUP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither United States Air Force nor NAVAL GROUP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither United States Air Force company nor NAVAL GROUP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

United States Air Force company employs more people globally than NAVAL GROUP company, reflecting its scale as a Defense and Space Manufacturing.

Neither United States Air Force nor NAVAL GROUP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither United States Air Force nor NAVAL GROUP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither United States Air Force nor NAVAL GROUP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither United States Air Force nor NAVAL GROUP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither United States Air Force nor NAVAL GROUP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither United States Air Force nor NAVAL GROUP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N