Comparison Overview
UNIQA Software Services
UNIQA Software Services
Strada Emil Racovita 23, Cluj-Napoca, Cluj, RO, 400165
Last Update: 16/12/2025
Our purpose is to deliver first class IT & Data to the UNIQA Group while providing stability and life balance in a mutually trusting environment. Our strengths are being part of an international enterprise, providing to our employees the environment for a balanced life...
Snowflake
The Cloud, US
Last Update: 06/10/2026
**Snowflake is proud to be the Official Data Collaboration Provider for LA28 and Team USA.** Snowflake delivers the AI Data Cloud — a global network where thousands of organizations mobilize data with near-unlimited scale, concurrency, and performance. Inside the AI Da...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
UNIQA Software Services
Snowflake
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for UNIQA Software Services in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Snowflake has 1174.51% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - UNIQA Software Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)
UNIQA Software Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Snowflake (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Snowflake cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
UNIQA Software Services
Snowflake
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.