Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

UNIQA 4WARDUNIQA 4WARD
VS
Munich ReMunich Re
UNIQA 4WARD

UNIQA 4WARD

Bottova 2 a, Bratislava, 811 09, SK

Last Update: 25/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.uniqa4ward.com/
752/1000Fair

We are UNIQA 4WARD, a member of UNIQA Insurance Group, based in Bratislava. We provide services to the UNIQA Headquarters in Vienna and all international business units in the CEE region in the areas of Actuarial, Risk, Security Management, HR & Brand and Reinsurance. ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Munich Re

Munich Re

Königinstrasse 107, Munich, 80802, DE

Last Update: 20/10/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.munichre.com
810/1000Good

Munich Re is one of the world’s leading providers of reinsurance, primary insurance and insurance-related risk solutions. The group consists of the reinsurance and ERGO business segments, as well as the capital investment company MEAG. We are globally active and operate...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:15,187
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
UNIQA 4WARD

UNIQA 4WARD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Munich Re

Munich Re

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UNIQA 4WARD in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

Munich Re has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - UNIQA 4WARD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UNIQA 4WARD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Munich Re (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Munich Re cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
UNIQA 4WARD

UNIQA 4WARD

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Munich Re

Munich Re

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MUN1786568796

FAQ

Between UNIQA 4WARD company and Munich Re company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between UNIQA 4WARD company and Munich Re company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between UNIQA 4WARD company and Munich Re company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between UNIQA 4WARD company and Munich Re company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between UNIQA 4WARD company and Munich Re company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between UNIQA 4WARD company and Munich Re company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between UNIQA 4WARD company and Munich Re company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between UNIQA 4WARD company and Munich Re company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between UNIQA 4WARD company and Munich Re company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between UNIQA 4WARD company and Munich Re company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between UNIQA 4WARD company and Munich Re company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between UNIQA 4WARD and Munich Re, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between UNIQA 4WARD and Munich Re, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - UNIQA 4WARD or Munich Re ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - UNIQA 4WARD or Munich Re ?
Between UNIQA 4WARD and Munich Re, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between UNIQA 4WARD and Munich Re, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-113705
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-9825
SUMMARY

IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94402
SUMMARY

IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93888
SUMMARY

IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93744
SUMMARY

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9