Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Universidade PaulistaUniversidade Paulista
VS
University of ConnecticutUniversity of Connecticut
Universidade Paulista

Universidade Paulista

Av. Paulista, 900, São Paulo, São Paulo, BR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.unip.br/
815/1000Good

A UNIP promove, em todas as áreas da educação, a formação atualizada dos alunos e sua capacitação para uma sociedade em constante mudança, por meio de um ensino de qualidade, tecnologicamente avançado e dirigido para o futuro. Sua finalidade maior é promover o desenvol...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:15,403
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
University of Connecticut

University of Connecticut

352 Mansfield Road, Storrs, CT, US, 06269

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://uconn.edu
798/1000Fair

The University of Connecticut (UConn), a Wall Street Journal top 10 public university, is home to more than 32,000 students, 1,500 faculty, 255,000 proud alumni, and a handsome husky named Jonathan. The University has fourteen schools and colleges: Agriculture and Natu...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:13,623
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Universidade Paulista

Universidade Paulista

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
University of Connecticut

University of Connecticut

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Universidade Paulista in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Connecticut in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Universidade Paulista (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Universidade Paulista cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - University of Connecticut (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Connecticut cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Universidade Paulista

Universidade Paulista

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
University of Connecticut

University of Connecticut

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Universidade Paulista company and University of Connecticut company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Universidade Paulista company and University of Connecticut company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Universidade Paulista company and University of Connecticut company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Universidade Paulista company and University of Connecticut company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Universidade Paulista company and University of Connecticut company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Universidade Paulista company and University of Connecticut company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Universidade Paulista company and University of Connecticut company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Universidade Paulista company and University of Connecticut company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Universidade Paulista company and University of Connecticut company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Universidade Paulista company and University of Connecticut company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Universidade Paulista company and University of Connecticut company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Universidade Paulista and University of Connecticut, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Universidade Paulista and University of Connecticut, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Universidade Paulista or University of Connecticut ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Universidade Paulista or University of Connecticut ?
Between Universidade Paulista and University of Connecticut, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Universidade Paulista and University of Connecticut, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1