Comparison Overview

Union Printers Home

VS

Preservation Virginia

Union Printers Home

101 S Union Blvd, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80910-3137, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Union Printers Home has proudly served the Colorado Springs area since 1892. Extremely rich in history and beauty Union Printers Home can truly call itself one of a kind. Look outside its windows and you’ll see our hometown's favorite, often snowcapped mountain, Pikes Peak. Take a stroll on the groomed 27 acre campus and one might just find all the necessities of a perfect place to relax, restore, and heal. Find the serenity and peace you deserve at the Union Printers Home.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Preservation Virginia

204 West Franklin Street, Richmond, 23220, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Since 1889, Preservation Virginia has preserved historic places and raised awareness of the importance of perpetuating and revitalizing Virginia's cultural, architectural and historic heritage, thereby ensuring that historic places are integral parts of the lives of present and future generations. We currently own and operate six historic sites across the state, including: Historic Jamestowne, Patrick Henry's Scotchtown, Smith's Fort Plantation, Cape Henry Lighthouse, Bacon's Castle and the John Marshall House. Without our efforts to help others understand the importance of retaining important parts of our heritage, Virginia would have lost historic sites – and the stories that go with them – forever. It is more important, now than ever, to integrate history and its lessons into tomorrow's culture. Through our work, we strengthen communities, create connections for people and help sustain a strong economy. We will continue to foster the use of historic preservation tools and applications in order to develop and sustain vibrant communities.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 81
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/union-printers-home.jpeg
Union Printers Home
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/preservation-virginia.jpeg
Preservation Virginia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Union Printers Home
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Preservation Virginia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Union Printers Home in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Preservation Virginia in 2025.

Incident History — Union Printers Home (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Union Printers Home cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Preservation Virginia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Preservation Virginia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/union-printers-home.jpeg
Union Printers Home
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/preservation-virginia.jpeg
Preservation Virginia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Union Printers Home company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Preservation Virginia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Preservation Virginia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Union Printers Home company.

In the current year, Preservation Virginia company and Union Printers Home company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Preservation Virginia company nor Union Printers Home company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Preservation Virginia company nor Union Printers Home company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Preservation Virginia company nor Union Printers Home company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Union Printers Home company nor Preservation Virginia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Union Printers Home nor Preservation Virginia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Union Printers Home company nor Preservation Virginia company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Preservation Virginia company employs more people globally than Union Printers Home company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Union Printers Home nor Preservation Virginia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Union Printers Home nor Preservation Virginia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Union Printers Home nor Preservation Virginia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Union Printers Home nor Preservation Virginia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Union Printers Home nor Preservation Virginia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Union Printers Home nor Preservation Virginia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X