Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Union County, NCUnion County, NC
VS
Centers for Disease Control and PreventionCenters for Disease Control and Prevention
Union County, NC

Union County, NC

500 N Main St, Monroe, 28112, US

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
658/1000Weak

This is the official LinkedIn profile for Union County Government. Visit unioncountync.gov for information on county departments, services, programs, job openings, and more. Union County is one of the fastest-growing counties in the Carolinas. Union County has something...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:440
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, 30333, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.cdc.gov
801/1000Good

CDC works 24/7 keeping America safe from health, safety and security threats, both foreign and domestic. Whether diseases start at home or abroad, are chronic or acute, curable or preventable, human error or deliberate attack, CDC fights it and supports communities and ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:20,185
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Union County, NC

Union County, NC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Union County, NC in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Union County, NC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Union County, NC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Union County, NC

Union County, NC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
UNI0992709092525
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CEN05319622

FAQ

Between Union County, NC company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Union County, NC company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Union County, NC company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Union County, NC company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Union County, NC company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Union County, NC company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Union County, NC company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Union County, NC company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Union County, NC company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Union County, NC company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Union County, NC company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Union County, NC and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Union County, NC and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Union County, NC or Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Union County, NC or Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ?
Between Union County, NC and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Union County, NC and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1