Comparison Overview
Unimed Rio Grande do Sul

Unimed Rio Grande do Sul
Rua Santa Terezinha, 340, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, BR, 90040-180
Last Update: 29/11/2025
A Federação Unimed/RS foi fundada em 25 de junho de 1972, com o nome de FECOMED. Atualmente, sua denominação é UNIMED/RS - Federação das Cooperativas Médicas do Rio Grande do Sul Ltda. É constituída por 28 Cooperativas Filiadas: a Unimed Central de Serviços-RS, a Unic...

Herbalife
800 W Olympic Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, US, 90015
Last Update: 11/09/2026
Herbalife is a global health and wellness community born to support you in living your best life. For over 40 years and in more than 90 countries, we’ve empowered millions of people to make real changes to their lives with our science-backed products, the support of a c...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Unimed Rio Grande do Sul







Herbalife






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Unimed Rio Grande do Sul in 2026.
Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Herbalife in 2026.
Incident History - Unimed Rio Grande do Sul (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Unimed Rio Grande do Sul cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Herbalife (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Herbalife cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Unimed Rio Grande do Sul

Herbalife
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A security flaw has been discovered in THU-MIG yoloe up to 40cd606cabdbe2b566d6f14a6b162c89206e9a1b. This affects the function eval of the file ultralytics/nn/autobackend.py of the component AutoBackend Model Loading. The manipulation of the argument imgsz/names/kpt_shape results in improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Coder before 2.34.7 contains an IP spoofing vulnerability in the ExtractRealIPAddress middleware that trusts the leftmost, client-supplied X-Forwarded-For value instead of the client IP appended by a reverse proxy. Attackers can send forged X-Forwarded-For values through appending proxies to bypass per-IP rate limits on login, one-time passcode, and password validation endpoints, enabling brute-force attacks, and to falsify IP addresses recorded in audit logs.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a user enumeration vulnerability because userpassword.Compare() substitutes a placeholder hash derived from the string "hunter2" when a stored password hash is empty. Unauthenticated attackers can submit logins with the password "hunter2" and distinguish HTTP 403 from 401 responses to enumerate valid accounts and reveal the authentication provider of SSO-only users.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a stored HTML injection vulnerability because the ApplicationName and LogoURL appearance settings are rendered into HTML output without sufficient escaping. Attackers with the Owner role can store HTML markup in these settings that renders in the Coder dashboard and in SMTP notification emails sent to other deployment users.
Coder from 2.0.0 before 2.34.8 contains an open redirect vulnerability in handleAPIKeySmuggling that allows attackers to redirect users externally via unsanitized r.URL.Path values. Attackers can craft links on trusted workspace app subdomains with paths beginning with double slashes, which become scheme-relative redirects to attacker sites for phishing.