Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Unimed Noroeste/RSUnimed Noroeste/RS
VS
Siemens HealthineersSiemens Healthineers
Unimed Noroeste/RS

Unimed Noroeste/RS

Rua Siqueira Couto 93, Ijuí, Rio Grande do Sul 98700-000, BR

Last Update: 27/04/2026

View Profile
765/1000Fair

A Unimed Noroeste/RS, foi fundada em Ijuí no dia 20 de outubro de 1971. Nestes quase 40 anos de atividades, tornou-se uma referência dentro do sistema Unimed com a inauguração de seu hospital próprio, com o conceito de excelência em saúde. Atualmente a empresa emprega ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:82
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Siemens Healthineers

Siemens Healthineers

Siemensstr. 3, Forchheim, 91301, DE

Last Update: 12/07/2026

View Profile
818/1000Good

Siemens Healthineers is a leading medtech company with over 125 years of experience. We pioneer breakthroughs in healthcare. For everyone. Everywhere. Sustainably. Our portfolio, spanning in vitro and in vivo diagnostics to image-guided therapy and cancer care, is cruci...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:49,070
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Unimed Noroeste/RS

Unimed Noroeste/RS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Siemens Healthineers

Siemens Healthineers

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Unimed Noroeste/RS in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Siemens Healthineers in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Unimed Noroeste/RS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Unimed Noroeste/RS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Siemens Healthineers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Siemens Healthineers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Unimed Noroeste/RS

Unimed Noroeste/RS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Siemens Healthineers

Siemens Healthineers

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Unimed Noroeste/RS company and Siemens Healthineers company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Unimed Noroeste/RS company and Siemens Healthineers company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Unimed Noroeste/RS company and Siemens Healthineers company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Unimed Noroeste/RS company and Siemens Healthineers company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Unimed Noroeste/RS company and Siemens Healthineers company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Unimed Noroeste/RS company and Siemens Healthineers company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Unimed Noroeste/RS company and Siemens Healthineers company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Unimed Noroeste/RS company and Siemens Healthineers company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Unimed Noroeste/RS company and Siemens Healthineers company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Unimed Noroeste/RS company and Siemens Healthineers company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Unimed Noroeste/RS company and Siemens Healthineers company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Unimed Noroeste/RS and Siemens Healthineers, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Unimed Noroeste/RS and Siemens Healthineers, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Unimed Noroeste/RS or Siemens Healthineers ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Unimed Noroeste/RS or Siemens Healthineers ?
Between Unimed Noroeste/RS and Siemens Healthineers, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Unimed Noroeste/RS and Siemens Healthineers, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1