Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Unimed Pato BrancoUnimed Pato Branco
VS
Life Time Inc.Life Time Inc.
Unimed Pato Branco

Unimed Pato Branco

Rua Tamoio, 253, Pato Branco, Paraná, BR, 85501067

Last Update: 12/11/2025

View Profile
766/1000Fair

A Unimed Pato Branco foi fundada em 2 de abril de 1990, por um grupo de médicos que ousou idealizar a construção de uma Cooperativa, para impulsionar a área da saúde, na região Sudoeste do Paraná. Hoje, com cerca de 300 cooperados, a Unimed Pato Branco é considerada um...

NAICS:71394
NAICS Definition:Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
Employees:170
Subsidiaries:82
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Life Time Inc.

Life Time Inc.

2902 Corporate Place, Chanhassen, MN, US, 55317

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.lifetime.life/
785/1000Fair

Life Time provides an entertaining, educational, friendly and inviting, functional and innovative experience of uncompromising quality that meets the health and fitness needs of the entire family. Life Time is a wellness pioneer reshaping the way consumers approach the...

NAICS:71394
NAICS Definition:Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
Employees:19,900
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Unimed Pato Branco

Unimed Pato Branco

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Life Time Inc.

Life Time Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Unimed Pato Branco in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Life Time Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Unimed Pato Branco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Unimed Pato Branco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Life Time Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Life Time Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Unimed Pato Branco

Unimed Pato Branco

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Life Time Inc.

Life Time Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Unimed Pato Branco company and Life Time Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Unimed Pato Branco company and Life Time Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Unimed Pato Branco company and Life Time Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Unimed Pato Branco company and Life Time Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Unimed Pato Branco company and Life Time Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Unimed Pato Branco company and Life Time Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Unimed Pato Branco company and Life Time Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Unimed Pato Branco company and Life Time Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Unimed Pato Branco company and Life Time Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Unimed Pato Branco company and Life Time Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Unimed Pato Branco company and Life Time Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Unimed Pato Branco and Life Time Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Unimed Pato Branco and Life Time Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Unimed Pato Branco or Life Time Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Unimed Pato Branco or Life Time Inc. ?
Between Unimed Pato Branco and Life Time Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Unimed Pato Branco and Life Time Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3