Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Unimed Pato BrancoUnimed Pato Branco
VS
Gold's GymGold's Gym
Unimed Pato Branco

Unimed Pato Branco

Rua Tamoio, 253, Pato Branco, Paraná, BR, 85501067

Last Update: 12/11/2025

View Profile
766/1000Fair

A Unimed Pato Branco foi fundada em 2 de abril de 1990, por um grupo de médicos que ousou idealizar a construção de uma Cooperativa, para impulsionar a área da saúde, na região Sudoeste do Paraná. Hoje, com cerca de 300 cooperados, a Unimed Pato Branco é considerada um...

NAICS:71394
NAICS Definition:Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
Employees:170
Subsidiaries:82
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Gold's Gym

Gold's Gym

5420 Lyndon B Johnson Fwy, Suite 300, Dallas, Texas, US, 75240

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.goldsgym.com
789/1000Fair

Gold’s Gym has been the world’s trusted fitness authority since 1965. From its beginning as a small gym in Venice, California, Gold’s Gym has grown into a global icon with more than 700 locations serving 3 million people across six continents each day. Whether you are...

NAICS:71394
NAICS Definition:Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
Employees:16,850
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Unimed Pato Branco

Unimed Pato Branco

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Gold's Gym

Gold's Gym

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Unimed Pato Branco in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gold's Gym in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Unimed Pato Branco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Unimed Pato Branco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Gold's Gym (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gold's Gym cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Unimed Pato Branco

Unimed Pato Branco

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Gold's Gym

Gold's Gym

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Unimed Pato Branco company and Gold's Gym company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Unimed Pato Branco company and Gold's Gym company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Unimed Pato Branco company and Gold's Gym company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Unimed Pato Branco company and Gold's Gym company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Unimed Pato Branco company and Gold's Gym company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Unimed Pato Branco company and Gold's Gym company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Unimed Pato Branco company and Gold's Gym company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Unimed Pato Branco company and Gold's Gym company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Unimed Pato Branco company and Gold's Gym company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Unimed Pato Branco company and Gold's Gym company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Unimed Pato Branco company and Gold's Gym company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Unimed Pato Branco and Gold's Gym, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Unimed Pato Branco and Gold's Gym, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Unimed Pato Branco or Gold's Gym ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Unimed Pato Branco or Gold's Gym ?
Between Unimed Pato Branco and Gold's Gym, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Unimed Pato Branco and Gold's Gym, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2