Comparison Overview
Unimed Leste Fluminense

Unimed Leste Fluminense
Rua Doutor Borman 51, Niterói, 24020-320, BR
Last Update: 14/01/2026
A Unimed Leste Fluminense é composta por cerca de 900 médicos cooperados que atendem a mais de 100 mil clientes. Além disso, o corpo funcional é constituído de aproximadamente 2.000 funcionários. Detentora de unidades de atendimento médico próprios, para garantir maior...

HCA Healthcare
1 Park Plaza, Nashville, TN, US, 37203
Last Update: 04/09/2026
HCA Healthcare is dedicated to giving people a healthier tomorrow. As one of the nation’s leading providers of healthcare services, HCA Healthcare is comprised of 189 hospitals and approximately 2,600 sites of care in 19 states and the United Kingdom. In addition to h...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Unimed Leste Fluminense







HCA Healthcare






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Unimed Leste Fluminense in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for HCA Healthcare in 2026.
Incident History - Unimed Leste Fluminense (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Unimed Leste Fluminense cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - HCA Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)
HCA Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Unimed Leste Fluminense

HCA Healthcare
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.
An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.
The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.
An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.
A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.