Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Unimed ErechimUnimed Erechim
VS
American Heart AssociationAmerican Heart Association
Unimed Erechim

Unimed Erechim

Av. Sete de Setembro, Erechim, RS 99.709-182, BR

Last Update: 27/04/2026

View Profile
768/1000Fair

Somos a primeira cooperativa médica do Rio Grande do Sul. Desde a fundação, em 5 de outubro 1971, nosso trabalho é reconhecido pelo alto padrão de qualidade. Contamos com 244 médicos cooperados e aproximadamente 260 colaboradores permanentemente capacitados para oferece...

NAICS:71394
NAICS Definition:Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:79
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
American Heart Association

American Heart Association

7272 Greenville Ave, Dallas, 75231-4596, US

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.heart.org
775/1000Fair

Welcome to the American Heart Association’s movement to change the future of health and be the progress that ensures longer, healthier lives for all. By driving breakthroughs in science, policy, and care – together -- we can overcome today’s biggest health challenges a...

NAICS:71394
NAICS Definition:Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
Employees:11,074
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Unimed Erechim

Unimed Erechim

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
American Heart Association

American Heart Association

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Unimed Erechim in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for American Heart Association in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Unimed Erechim (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Unimed Erechim cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - American Heart Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American Heart Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Unimed Erechim

Unimed Erechim

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
American Heart Association

American Heart Association

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
AME210072825

FAQ

Between Unimed Erechim company and American Heart Association company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Unimed Erechim company and American Heart Association company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Unimed Erechim company and American Heart Association company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Unimed Erechim company and American Heart Association company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Unimed Erechim company and American Heart Association company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Unimed Erechim company and American Heart Association company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Unimed Erechim company and American Heart Association company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Unimed Erechim company and American Heart Association company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Unimed Erechim company and American Heart Association company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Unimed Erechim company and American Heart Association company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Unimed Erechim company and American Heart Association company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Unimed Erechim and American Heart Association, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Unimed Erechim and American Heart Association, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Unimed Erechim or American Heart Association ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Unimed Erechim or American Heart Association ?
Between Unimed Erechim and American Heart Association, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Unimed Erechim and American Heart Association, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2