Comparison Overview
Unimed Costa do Descobrimento

Unimed Costa do Descobrimento
Rua Padre João Gualberto de Magalhães, 765, Vivendas Costa Azul, Eunápolis, BA 45820-645, BR
Last Update: 27/04/2026
Fundada em 1994, a Unimed Costa do Descobrimento é classificada como uma cooperativa de médio porte e possui sede administrativa própria, localizada na Rua Padre João Gualberto de Magalhães, 765 – Eunápolis/BA. Atuando há 28 anos no mercado de saúde suplementar da regi...

Aetna, a CVS Health Company
151 Farmington Avenue, Hartford, 06156, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Here at Aetna, a CVS Health® company, we’re building a healthier world by making health care easy, affordable and all about you. Because Healthier Happens Together™! Follow our page for company news, industry commentary, jobs and more. Founded in 1853 in Hartford, CT, A...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Unimed Costa do Descobrimento







Aetna, a CVS Health Company






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Unimed Costa do Descobrimento in 2026.
Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Aetna, a CVS Health Company in 2026.
Incident History - Unimed Costa do Descobrimento (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Unimed Costa do Descobrimento cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Aetna, a CVS Health Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Aetna, a CVS Health Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Unimed Costa do Descobrimento

Aetna, a CVS Health Company
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in GroupController::updatePermissions that allows GROUP_EDIT administrators to grant arbitrary rights to groups without verifying they hold those rights themselves. A delegated administrator can exploit this by assigning high-value permissions to a group they belong to, inheriting those rights and escalating privileges up to full administrative control.
n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.
Grav CMS before 2.0.0-beta.2 contains multiple code-execution vulnerabilities. Three unsafe unserialize() calls - in Scheduler\JobQueue, Framework\Cache\Adapter\FileCache, and Session - deserialize untrusted data without restricting allowed classes, enabling PHP object injection and, via a gadget chain, arbitrary code execution where an attacker controls the serialized input. Additionally, InstallCommand's git clone operation passes the branch, url, and path parameters into a shell command without escaping, allowing OS command injection via plugin/theme installation (which requires admin access). A Twig security blocklist bypass (server-side template injection) is also present. The issues are fixed in 2.0.0-beta.2.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability within the debug.pl script that is reachable without authentication. A remote attacker can submit a specially crafted HTTP request containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate input sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges on the underlying system.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability in the ms_service.pl service, which listens on TCP port 9000 by default and accepts custom network packets to perform device actions. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted packet containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges.