Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

UnimedUnimed
VS
Swiss Federal AdministrationSwiss Federal Administration
Unimed

Unimed

Alameda Santos 1827, São Paulo, BR

Last Update: 27/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://unimed.coop.br
812/1000Good

Somos o maior sistema cooperativo de médicos do mundo. Desde a fundação da Unimed Santos (SP), em 1967, nosso Sistema cresceu até abranger 341 cooperativas médicas, com mais de 118 mil médicos, atendendo a 19 milhões de beneficiários. Somos a marca mais lembrada pelo...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:82
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Swiss Federal Administration

Swiss Federal Administration

Eigerstrasse 71, Bern, 3003, CH

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.stelle.admin.ch
786/1000Fair

Seven departments, the Federal Chancellery and around 70 administrative units make up the Federal Administration. With around 38,000 employees, we are one of the largest employers in Switzerland. Everyone who works for the Federal Administration actively contributes t...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:24,156
Subsidiaries:68
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Unimed

Unimed

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Swiss Federal Administration

Swiss Federal Administration

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Unimed in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swiss Federal Administration in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Unimed (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Unimed cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Swiss Federal Administration (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swiss Federal Administration cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Unimed

Unimed

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Swiss Federal Administration

Swiss Federal Administration

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Unimed company and Swiss Federal Administration company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Unimed company and Swiss Federal Administration company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Unimed company and Swiss Federal Administration company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Unimed company and Swiss Federal Administration company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Unimed company and Swiss Federal Administration company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Unimed company and Swiss Federal Administration company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Unimed company and Swiss Federal Administration company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Unimed company and Swiss Federal Administration company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Unimed company and Swiss Federal Administration company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Unimed company and Swiss Federal Administration company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Unimed company and Swiss Federal Administration company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Unimed and Swiss Federal Administration, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Unimed and Swiss Federal Administration, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Unimed or Swiss Federal Administration ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Unimed or Swiss Federal Administration ?
Between Unimed and Swiss Federal Administration, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Unimed and Swiss Federal Administration, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2