Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Unilever Food Solutions UKUnilever Food Solutions UK
VS
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
Unilever Food Solutions UK

Unilever Food Solutions UK

Leatherhead, GB

Last Update: 28/01/2026

View Profile
764/1000Fair

Unilever Food Solutions UK is the foodservice division of Unilever. We bring together the full spectrum of goods and services from Unilever Food Solutions and Wall’s to support the needs of chefs, hospitality businesses and operators across the industry – all under one ...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.

Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.

53 South Ave, Burlington, 01803, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
815/1000Good

Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) is a leading beverage company in North America, with annual revenue in excess of $14.1 billion and nearly 28,000 employees. KDP holds leadership positions in soft drinks, specialty coffee and tea, water, juice and juice drinks and mixers, and mark...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:13,354
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Unilever Food Solutions UK

Unilever Food Solutions UK

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.

Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Unilever Food Solutions UK in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Unilever Food Solutions UK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Unilever Food Solutions UK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Unilever Food Solutions UK

Unilever Food Solutions UK

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.

Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Unilever Food Solutions UK company and Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Unilever Food Solutions UK company and Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Unilever Food Solutions UK company and Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Unilever Food Solutions UK company and Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Unilever Food Solutions UK company and Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Unilever Food Solutions UK company and Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Unilever Food Solutions UK company and Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Unilever Food Solutions UK company and Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Unilever Food Solutions UK company and Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Unilever Food Solutions UK company and Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Unilever Food Solutions UK company and Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Unilever Food Solutions UK and Keurig Dr Pepper Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Unilever Food Solutions UK and Keurig Dr Pepper Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Unilever Food Solutions UK or Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Unilever Food Solutions UK or Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. ?
Between Unilever Food Solutions UK and Keurig Dr Pepper Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Unilever Food Solutions UK and Keurig Dr Pepper Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-44654
SUMMARY

LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, a shared-agent editor can delete file records through `DELETE /api/files` that the owner has reused across multiple agents. The deletion removes the file globally — not just from the shared agent — breaking the owner's other private agents that reference the same `file_id`. The private agent retains a stale `file_id` reference that no longer resolves. A shared-agent editor can destroy files that the owner uses across multiple agents. The owner's private agents — which the attacker has no access to — break silently with stale `file_id` references. This is a cross-agent integrity violation: editing access to one agent should not affect another. Version 0.8.4 contains a patch.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-44653
SUMMARY

LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, users with only `VIEW` access to an MCP server can retrieve the server's decrypted admin-managed secrets through `GET /api/mcp/servers` and `GET /api/mcp/servers/:serverName`. The returned config includes plaintext values for `apiKey.key` and `oauth.client_secret`. This allows viewers of a shared MCP server to exfiltrate the underlying provider credentials. Version 0.8..4 contains a patch. Other remediations include: never returning decrypted admin-managed secrets to non-owners; redacting apiKey.key and oauth.client_secret from all API responses consider returning only boolean presence indicators for secrets, similar to the auth-values route pattern; and, if owners need to edit configs without re-entering secrets, preserving secrets server-side and returning placeholders instead of plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-42507
SUMMARY

When returning errors, functions in the net/textproto package would include its input as part of the error. This might allow an attacker to inject misleading content to errors that are printed or logged.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-42504
SUMMARY

Decoding a maliciously-crafted MIME header containing many invalid encoded-words can consume excessive CPU.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-41412
SUMMARY

alf.io is an open source ticket reservation system for conferences, trade shows, workshops, and meetups. Prior to version 2.0-M5-2606, the alf.io extension sandbox injects a fully-functional HTTP client (`simpleHttpClient`) into every extension script's scope. The `postFileAndSaveResponse()` method accepts an arbitrary filesystem path as its `file` parameter and reads the file contents using `new FileInputStream(file)` with no path validation, directory restriction, or allowlist. A malicious extension script can read any file accessible to the JVM process user and exfiltrate it to an attacker-controlled server via HTTP POST. Version 2.0-M5-2606 patches the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2