Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Unilever Food Solutions ANZUnilever Food Solutions ANZ
VS
Nestlé Nespresso SANestlé Nespresso SA
Unilever Food Solutions ANZ

Unilever Food Solutions ANZ

219 North Rocks Rd, North Rocks, 2151, AU

Last Update: 13/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ufs.com
763/1000Fair

It takes commitment to run a successful kitchen. The drama, the burns, the pain, the hours... and only a chef gets that. We're part of a global network of 250 chefs in 76 countries, covering 50 cuisines. We help you get #Prepped for tomorrrow with high-quality ingr...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Nestlé Nespresso SA

Nestlé Nespresso SA

Avenue de Rhodanie 40, Lausanne, CH, CH 1007

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.nespresso.com
802/1000Good

Coffee is at the heart of everything we do, and consumer satisfaction is why we do it. Our story started with one simple idea: everyone should be able to make the perfect cup of coffee at home. Something we still believe today, which is why we think delivering the hig...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:12,727
Subsidiaries:34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Unilever Food Solutions ANZ

Unilever Food Solutions ANZ

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Nestlé Nespresso SA

Nestlé Nespresso SA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Unilever Food Solutions ANZ in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nestlé Nespresso SA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Unilever Food Solutions ANZ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Unilever Food Solutions ANZ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Nestlé Nespresso SA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nestlé Nespresso SA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Unilever Food Solutions ANZ

Unilever Food Solutions ANZ

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Nestlé Nespresso SA

Nestlé Nespresso SA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Unilever Food Solutions ANZ company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Unilever Food Solutions ANZ company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Unilever Food Solutions ANZ company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Unilever Food Solutions ANZ company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Unilever Food Solutions ANZ company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Unilever Food Solutions ANZ company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Unilever Food Solutions ANZ company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Unilever Food Solutions ANZ company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Unilever Food Solutions ANZ company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Unilever Food Solutions ANZ company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Unilever Food Solutions ANZ company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Unilever Food Solutions ANZ and Nestlé Nespresso SA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Unilever Food Solutions ANZ and Nestlé Nespresso SA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Unilever Food Solutions ANZ or Nestlé Nespresso SA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Unilever Food Solutions ANZ or Nestlé Nespresso SA ?
Between Unilever Food Solutions ANZ and Nestlé Nespresso SA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Unilever Food Solutions ANZ and Nestlé Nespresso SA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1