Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Unico SigortaUnico Sigorta
VS
GallagherGallagher
Unico Sigorta

Unico Sigorta

Nida Kule Göztepe İş Merkezi Merdivenköy Mah. Bora Sokak No:1 Kat: 22 & 24, İstanbul, TR

Last Update: 04/12/2025

View Profile
754/1000Fair

1988 yılından günümüze dek Türk sigorta sektörünün köklü oyuncularından biri olan Aviva Sigorta A.Ş., 2015 yılı Eylül ayı itibariyle yoluna United Insurance Company – Unico Sigorta A.Ş olarak devam etmektedir. Ortakları arasında İngiltere’nin güçlü sermaye yönetim ş...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:397
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Gallagher

Gallagher

2850 Golf Road, Rolling Meadows, 60008, US

Last Update: 19/07/2026

View Profile
771/1000Fair

Gallagher, a global insurance brokerage, risk management, and consulting firm, serves communities around the globe, helping clients address risk, protecting assets, and recovering from losses. The products and services we provide keep businesses and institutions running...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:46,421
Subsidiaries:22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Unico Sigorta

Unico Sigorta

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Gallagher

Gallagher

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Unico Sigorta in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gallagher in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Unico Sigorta (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Unico Sigorta cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Gallagher (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gallagher cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Unico Sigorta

Unico Sigorta

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Gallagher

Gallagher

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
GAL24413322
🔒 Incident : Breach
GAL849072625
🔒 Incident : Breach
GAL049072425

FAQ

Between Unico Sigorta company and Gallagher company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Unico Sigorta company and Gallagher company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Unico Sigorta company and Gallagher company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Unico Sigorta company and Gallagher company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Unico Sigorta company and Gallagher company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Unico Sigorta company and Gallagher company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Unico Sigorta company and Gallagher company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Unico Sigorta company and Gallagher company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Unico Sigorta company and Gallagher company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Unico Sigorta company and Gallagher company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Unico Sigorta company and Gallagher company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Unico Sigorta and Gallagher, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Unico Sigorta and Gallagher, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Unico Sigorta or Gallagher ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Unico Sigorta or Gallagher ?
Between Unico Sigorta and Gallagher, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Unico Sigorta and Gallagher, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1