Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

UNDP BrusselsUNDP Brussels
VS
UNHCR, the UN Refugee AgencyUNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency
UNDP Brussels

UNDP Brussels

Brussels, BE

Last Update: 17/01/2026

View Profile
747/1000Moderate

We nurture and promote UNDP's partnership with the European Union and Belgium

NAICS:92812
NAICS Definition:International Affairs
Employees:3
Subsidiaries:31
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency

UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency

94, rue de Montbrillant, Geneva, 1202, CH

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://unh.cr/6724adac9
808/1000Good

UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency, is a global organisation dedicated to saving lives, protecting rights and building a better future for people forced to flee their homes because of conflict and persecution. We lead international action to protect refugees, forcibly displa...

NAICS:92812
NAICS Definition:International Affairs
Employees:20,552
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
UNDP Brussels

UNDP Brussels

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency

UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs International Affairs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UNDP Brussels in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs International Affairs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - UNDP Brussels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UNDP Brussels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
UNDP Brussels

UNDP Brussels

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency

UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between UNDP Brussels company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between UNDP Brussels company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between UNDP Brussels company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between UNDP Brussels company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between UNDP Brussels company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between UNDP Brussels company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between UNDP Brussels company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between UNDP Brussels company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between UNDP Brussels company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between UNDP Brussels company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between UNDP Brussels company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between UNDP Brussels and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between UNDP Brussels and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - UNDP Brussels or UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - UNDP Brussels or UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency ?
Between UNDP Brussels and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between UNDP Brussels and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA