Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

U.S. Department of State - Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human RightsU.S. Department of State - Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights
VS
US Government Accountability OfficeUS Government Accountability Office
U.S. Department of State - Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights

U.S. Department of State - Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights

N/A

Last Update: 16/02/2026

View Profile
789/1000Fair

The Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights leads global diplomatic efforts to advance universal human rights, democratic renewal, and human-centered security. The bureaus and offices reporting to the Under Secretary advance the security of th...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:1
Subsidiaries:75
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
US Government Accountability Office

US Government Accountability Office

441 G Street, N.W., Washington, 20548, US

Last Update: 28/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.gao.gov
674/1000Weak

For more information about GAO, please visit www.gao.gov. General Information The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) is an independent, nonpartisan agency that works for Congress. Often called the "congressional watchdog,"​ GAO investigates how the federal go...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:17,303
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
U.S. Department of State - Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights

U.S. Department of State - Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
US Government Accountability Office

US Government Accountability Office

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for U.S. Department of State - Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

US Government Accountability Office has 98.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - U.S. Department of State - Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U.S. Department of State - Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - US Government Accountability Office (X = Date, Y = Severity)

US Government Accountability Office cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
U.S. Department of State - Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights

U.S. Department of State - Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
US Government Accountability Office

US Government Accountability Office

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
US-1790619948
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
US-1773483893
🔒 Incident : Breach
US-FOR1772821514

FAQ

Between U.S. Department of State - Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between U.S. Department of State - Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between U.S. Department of State - Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between U.S. Department of State - Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between U.S. Department of State - Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between U.S. Department of State - Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between U.S. Department of State - Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between U.S. Department of State - Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between U.S. Department of State - Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between U.S. Department of State - Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between U.S. Department of State - Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between U.S. Department of State - Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights and US Government Accountability Office, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between U.S. Department of State - Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights and US Government Accountability Office, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - U.S. Department of State - Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights or US Government Accountability Office ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - U.S. Department of State - Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights or US Government Accountability Office ?
Between U.S. Department of State - Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights and US Government Accountability Office, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between U.S. Department of State - Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights and US Government Accountability Office, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-105761
SUMMARY

Dify is an open-source LLM app development platform. Prior to 1.16.0, the PUT /console/api/apps/<app_id>/server endpoint in api/controllers/console/app/mcp_server.py used AppMCPServerController.put() to retrieve an AppMCPServer by the client-supplied server ID without verifying that the server belonged to the requested application and tenant. An authenticated workspace member could therefore change another application's MCP server status and parameters, potentially redirecting data or disabling the service. This issue is fixed in version 1.16.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-105760
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, a caller can use the request-level media_io_kwargs field to select the GLMGA video backend and supply large values for the fps and max_frames options without a strict work ceiling. GLMGA constructs and deduplicates an attacker-sized pre-decode frame-index list, allowing a compact request and tiny valid video to consume disproportionate CPU time and memory in the shared media-loading executor. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105759
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, the Rust frontend's track_http_metrics middleware records the raw HTTP method token as a Prometheus label for requests reaching registered routes. An unauthenticated attacker can send unique arbitrary method tokens to unguarded routes such as /tokenize, causing Prometheus's Family::get_or_create function to permanently create counter and histogram label sets. Those label sets increase process memory usage and enlarge the /metrics response until the service or monitoring path is exhausted. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-105758
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. From 0.24.0 until 0.30.0, the Qwen2VLVideoBackend and Qwen3VLVideoBackend classes accept request-level values for the media_io_kwargs.video.max_frames and media_io_kwargs.video.fps fields without enforcing server-side ceilings. An unauthenticated caller can submit these values to the /tokenize endpoint, causing the sampler to decode every frame selected from attacker-controlled video input, consume disproportionate frontend memory, and potentially terminate the API process before scheduling or admission control. The Rust frontend is not affected because it rejects the media_io_kwargs field. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105757
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, structured-output request failures can escape request-scoped validation and reach the EngineCore fatal-error path. A per-request backend mismatch can re-raise a grammar compilation exception, padding produced by the ngram_gpu speculative-decoding mode can pass a negative token to guidance validation, and the Rust frontend can admit empty structured-output values that the Python frontend rejects, allowing ordinary constrained-generation requests to terminate the shared engine. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8