Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

UNC HospitalsUNC Hospitals
VS
Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HPGreater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP
UNC Hospitals

UNC Hospitals

101 Manning Drive , Chapel Hill, 27514, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
746/1000Moderate

Since 1952, UNC Hospitals and the faculty practice have served patients from all 100 North Carolina counties and throughout the southeast. General terms of service for UNC Health social media: https://www.facebook.com/unchealthcare/about_details

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:478
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP

Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP

55, Boulevard Diderot, Paris, 75012, FR

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.aphp.fr
796/1000Fair

AP-HP (Greater Paris University Hospitals) is a European world-renowned university hospital. Its 39 hospitals treat 8 million people every year: in consultation, emergency, during scheduled or home hospitalizations. The AP-HP provides a public health service for everyo...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:37,495
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
UNC Hospitals

UNC Hospitals

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP

Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UNC Hospitals in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - UNC Hospitals (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UNC Hospitals cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
UNC Hospitals

UNC Hospitals

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
UNC2295223
Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP

Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between UNC Hospitals company and Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between UNC Hospitals company and Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between UNC Hospitals company and Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between UNC Hospitals company and Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between UNC Hospitals company and Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between UNC Hospitals company and Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between UNC Hospitals company and Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between UNC Hospitals company and Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between UNC Hospitals company and Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between UNC Hospitals company and Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between UNC Hospitals company and Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between UNC Hospitals and Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between UNC Hospitals and Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - UNC Hospitals or Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - UNC Hospitals or Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP ?
Between UNC Hospitals and Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between UNC Hospitals and Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3