Comparison Overview
UnaFinancial

UnaFinancial
1 George Street #10-01, Singapore, 049145, SG
Last Update: 10/03/2026
UnaFinancial is represented in several markets in Asia and Europe, offering easy-to-use digital financial solutions. Through its AI-based, machine learning and data-driven technologies and processes UnaFinancial provides precise and comprehensive risk management, comfo...

BB&T
214 North Tryon Street, Charlotte, NC, undefined, US
Last Update: 05/09/2026
We’d love to stay connected with you! Please follow our Truist company page and unfollow this page which is no longer active. BB&T and SunTrust formed Truist with a shared purpose—to inspire and build better lives and communities. With our combined resources, collectiv...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

UnaFinancial







BB&T






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for UnaFinancial in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for BB&T in 2026.
Incident History - UnaFinancial (X = Date, Y = Severity)
UnaFinancial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - BB&T (X = Date, Y = Severity)
BB&T cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

UnaFinancial

BB&T
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.
Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.