Ums-banking vs Nationale-nederlanden - Cyber Risk Comparison & Security Rating

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Comparison Overview

UMS Banking, Payment Processing Services

Nationale-Nederlanden

UMS Banking, Payment Processing Services

150 4th Ave N, Nashville, Tennessee, 37219, US

Last Update: 12/03/2026

View Profile

Between 750 and 799

http://www.umsbanking.com

753/1000Fair

UMS Banking has been partnering with Financial Institutions and other strategic partners all across the US to provide the latest payments technology and products for over 30 years. We understand the high level of service required by Community Banks and work to be an ext...

NAICS:52

NAICS Definition:N/A

Employees:16

Subsidiaries:0

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Nationale-Nederlanden

Pr. Beatrixlaan 35, Den Haag, ., NL, 2595 AK

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile

Between 750 and 799

http://www.nn.nl

775/1000Fair

NN Group is an international financial services company, active in 10 countries, with a strong presence in a number of European countries and Japan. Our roots lie in the Netherlands, with a rich history of more than 175 years. With our 15,000 employees, NN Group provid...

NAICS:52

NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance

Employees:10,660

Subsidiaries:1

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category

UMS Banking, Payment Processing Services

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Nationale-Nederlanden

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UMS Banking, Payment Processing Services in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nationale-Nederlanden in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - UMS Banking, Payment Processing Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UMS Banking, Payment Processing Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Nationale-Nederlanden (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nationale-Nederlanden cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...

UMS Banking, Payment Processing Services

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

Nationale-Nederlanden

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between UMS Banking, Payment Processing Services company and Nationale-Nederlanden company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?

Between UMS Banking, Payment Processing Services company and Nationale-Nederlanden company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?

Between UMS Banking, Payment Processing Services company and Nationale-Nederlanden company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?

Between UMS Banking, Payment Processing Services company and Nationale-Nederlanden company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?

Between UMS Banking, Payment Processing Services company and Nationale-Nederlanden company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?

Between UMS Banking, Payment Processing Services company and Nationale-Nederlanden company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?

Between UMS Banking, Payment Processing Services company and Nationale-Nederlanden company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?

Between UMS Banking, Payment Processing Services company and Nationale-Nederlanden company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?

Between UMS Banking, Payment Processing Services company and Nationale-Nederlanden company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?

Between UMS Banking, Payment Processing Services company and Nationale-Nederlanden company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?

Between UMS Banking, Payment Processing Services company and Nationale-Nederlanden company, which one has the largest number of employees ?

Between UMS Banking, Payment Processing Services and Nationale-Nederlanden, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?

Between UMS Banking, Payment Processing Services and Nationale-Nederlanden, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?

Which company is ISO 27001 certified - UMS Banking, Payment Processing Services or Nationale-Nederlanden ?

Which company is PCI DSS compliant - UMS Banking, Payment Processing Services or Nationale-Nederlanden ?

Between UMS Banking, Payment Processing Services and Nationale-Nederlanden, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?

Between UMS Banking, Payment Processing Services and Nationale-Nederlanden, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57100

SUMMARY

Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Microsoft Entra Provisioning Service (SyncFabric) allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-07-02

UPDATED

Date2026-07-02

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)

CVSS3

Base Score: 9.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

EXPLOITABILITY

3.1

REFERENCES

https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57100

CVE-2026-54998

SUMMARY

Incorrect authorization in Microsoft Exchange Online allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-07-02

UPDATED

Date2026-07-02

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)

CVSS3

Base Score: 8.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

5.9

EXPLOITABILITY

2.8

REFERENCES

https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54998

CVE-2026-45499

SUMMARY

Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure OpenAI allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-07-02

UPDATED

Date2026-07-02

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)

CVSS3

Base Score: 9.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

EXPLOITABILITY

3.1

REFERENCES

https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45499

CVE-2026-41106

SUMMARY

Url redirection to untrusted site ('open redirect') in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-07-02

UPDATED

Date2026-07-02

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.3)

CVSS3

Base Score: 9.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N

IMPACT SCORE

5.8

EXPLOITABILITY

2.8

REFERENCES

https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41106

CVE-2026-26145

SUMMARY

Improper access control in Azure Synapse allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-07-02

UPDATED

Date2026-07-02

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.8)

CVSS3

Base Score: 4.8

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

1.2

REFERENCES

https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26145