Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

University of Minnesota Research ComputingUniversity of Minnesota Research Computing
VS
Georgia Institute of TechnologyGeorgia Institute of Technology
University of Minnesota Research Computing

University of Minnesota Research Computing

N/A

Last Update: 19/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://rc.umn.edu/
770/1000Fair

Research Computing brings together a diverse portfolio of research computing and data resources available at the University of Minnesota, including high performance computing, spatial data, data science and artificial intelligence, and more. As a unit of the system-wide...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Georgia Institute of Technology

Georgia Institute of Technology

225 North Ave, Atlanta, Georgia , US, 30332-0530

Last Update: 08/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://gatech.edu
776/1000Fair

The Georgia Institute of Technology is one of the nation's premier research universities providing a focused, technologically based education to more than 25,000 undergraduate and graduate students . Ranked seventh among U.S. News & World Report's top public universitie...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:19,946
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
University of Minnesota Research Computing

University of Minnesota Research Computing

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Georgia Institute of Technology

Georgia Institute of Technology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Minnesota Research Computing in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

Georgia Institute of Technology has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - University of Minnesota Research Computing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Minnesota Research Computing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Georgia Institute of Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Georgia Institute of Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
University of Minnesota Research Computing

University of Minnesota Research Computing

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Georgia Institute of Technology

Georgia Institute of Technology

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
INSGEO1778258686

FAQ

Between University of Minnesota Research Computing company and Georgia Institute of Technology company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between University of Minnesota Research Computing company and Georgia Institute of Technology company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between University of Minnesota Research Computing company and Georgia Institute of Technology company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between University of Minnesota Research Computing company and Georgia Institute of Technology company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between University of Minnesota Research Computing company and Georgia Institute of Technology company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between University of Minnesota Research Computing company and Georgia Institute of Technology company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between University of Minnesota Research Computing company and Georgia Institute of Technology company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between University of Minnesota Research Computing company and Georgia Institute of Technology company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between University of Minnesota Research Computing company and Georgia Institute of Technology company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between University of Minnesota Research Computing company and Georgia Institute of Technology company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between University of Minnesota Research Computing company and Georgia Institute of Technology company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between University of Minnesota Research Computing and Georgia Institute of Technology, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between University of Minnesota Research Computing and Georgia Institute of Technology, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - University of Minnesota Research Computing or Georgia Institute of Technology ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - University of Minnesota Research Computing or Georgia Institute of Technology ?
Between University of Minnesota Research Computing and Georgia Institute of Technology, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between University of Minnesota Research Computing and Georgia Institute of Technology, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66339
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. After a CONNECT tunnel is established through an HTTP proxy, libsoup incorrectly attaches the Proxy-Authorization header to subsequent HTTPS requests sent through that tunnel to the destination server. This allows the destination server to capture proxy credentials, leading to information disclosure.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-66338
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. The chunked transfer encoding parser uses a permissive parsing function for chunk sizes that silently accepts inputs violating RFC 9112, including leading whitespace, plus sign prefixes, and trailing invalid characters. When libsoup operates behind a strict frontend proxy, this parsing differential can be exploited to smuggle HTTP requests.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-66337
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. An unsigned integer underflow in the soup_filter_input_stream_read_until() function causes a heap buffer over-read when parsing multipart HTTP responses. A malicious HTTP server can exploit this by sending a crafted multipart response, potentially causing the client application to crash or disclose sensitive heap memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-61892
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI allows a non-privileged user to modify tokens to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-61886
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI stores user account passwords in plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8