Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

UMC UtrechtUMC Utrecht
VS
UT MD AndersonUT MD Anderson
UMC Utrecht

UMC Utrecht

Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3508GA, NL

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile

The University Medical Center Utrecht is one of the largest academic healthcare institutions in the Netherlands. We provide the best healthcare for today’s patients, and we also work towards a healthy society in the future. Our organization has three core tasks: care, r...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:10,674
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
UT MD Anderson

UT MD Anderson

1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, 77030, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://MDAnderson.org
793/1000Fair

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center is one of the world’s most respected centers devoted exclusively to cancer patient care, research, education and prevention. Its sole mission is to end cancer for patients and their families around the world. UT MD And...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:23,215
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
UMC Utrecht

UMC Utrecht

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UT MD Anderson

UT MD Anderson

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UMC Utrecht in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UT MD Anderson in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - UMC Utrecht (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UMC Utrecht cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UT MD Anderson (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UT MD Anderson cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
UMC Utrecht

UMC Utrecht

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
UT MD Anderson

UT MD Anderson

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between UMC Utrecht company and UT MD Anderson company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between UMC Utrecht company and UT MD Anderson company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between UMC Utrecht company and UT MD Anderson company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between UMC Utrecht company and UT MD Anderson company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between UMC Utrecht company and UT MD Anderson company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between UMC Utrecht company and UT MD Anderson company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between UMC Utrecht company and UT MD Anderson company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between UMC Utrecht company and UT MD Anderson company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between UMC Utrecht company and UT MD Anderson company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between UMC Utrecht company and UT MD Anderson company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between UMC Utrecht company and UT MD Anderson company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between UMC Utrecht and UT MD Anderson, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between UMC Utrecht and UT MD Anderson, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - UMC Utrecht or UT MD Anderson ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - UMC Utrecht or UT MD Anderson ?
Between UMC Utrecht and UT MD Anderson, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between UMC Utrecht and UT MD Anderson, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-81203
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-80158
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-75340
SUMMARY

The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75338
SUMMARY

disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75336
SUMMARY

Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA