Comparison Overview
UMass Memorial Health

UMass Memorial Health
Worcester, Massachusetts, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
UMass Memorial Health is the health and wellness partner of the people of Central Massachusetts. Through pain and pandemics, our commitment to our communities never wanes. We use knowledge and innovation to create breakthrough medicine, to create jobs, and to make life ...

The University of Texas Medical Branch
301 University Blvd, Galveston, Texas, US, 77550
Last Update: 06/09/2026
The first academic health center in Texas opened its doors in 1891 and today has four campuses, five health sciences schools, seven institutes for advanced study, a research enterprise that includes one of only two national laboratories dedicated to the safe study of in...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

UMass Memorial Health







The University of Texas Medical Branch






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for UMass Memorial Health in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for The University of Texas Medical Branch in 2026.
Incident History - UMass Memorial Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)
UMass Memorial Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - The University of Texas Medical Branch (X = Date, Y = Severity)
The University of Texas Medical Branch cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

UMass Memorial Health

The University of Texas Medical Branch
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.
Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.