Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ÜlkerÜlker
VS
DanoneDanone
Ülker

Ülker

Kısıklı Mah. Ferah Cad. No:1, Istanbul, Marmara 34692, TR

Last Update: 24/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ulker.com.tr/tr
774/1000Fair

Ülker Hakkında: Merhum Sabri Ülker ve Asım Ülker tarafından 1944 yılında temelleri atılan Ülker, tüketicilerine her lokmada mutluluk vadeden global bir marka olarak faaliyetlerine devam ediyor. Eminönü Nohutçu Han’daki küçük bir atölyede üretime başlamasından bugüne 300...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Danone

Danone

17 boulevard Haussmann, Paris, 75000, FR

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.danone.com
803/1000Good

Danone is a leading global food and beverage company operating in three health-focused, fast-growing, and on-trend Categories: Essential Dairy & Plant-Based products, Waters, and Specialized Nutrition. With a long-standing mission of bringing health through food to as...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:70,667
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Ülker

Ülker

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Danone

Danone

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ülker in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Danone in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Ülker (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ülker cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Danone (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Danone cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Ülker

Ülker

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Danone

Danone

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Ülker company and Danone company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Ülker company and Danone company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Ülker company and Danone company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Ülker company and Danone company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Ülker company and Danone company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Ülker company and Danone company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Ülker company and Danone company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Ülker company and Danone company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Ülker company and Danone company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Ülker company and Danone company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Ülker company and Danone company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Ülker and Danone, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Ülker and Danone, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Ülker or Danone ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Ülker or Danone ?
Between Ülker and Danone, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Ülker and Danone, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2