Comparison Overview
STR Quality Assurance

STR Quality Assurance
N/A
Last Update: 22/12/2025
STR’s Quality Assurance business was sold to UL in 2011. STR Quality Assurance provided testing, inspection, audit, and responsible sourcing services, ensuring that its clients had the highest level of confidence in the quality, safety and social standards of their prod...

RP Sanjiv Goenka Group
Kolkata, IN
Last Update: 01/04/2026
The RPSG Group is one of India's fastest growing conglomerates with a significant global presence. The Group's businesses include power and energy, carbon black manufacturing, retail, IT-enabled services, FMCG, media and entertainment, and agriculture. In the last few ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

STR Quality Assurance







RP Sanjiv Goenka Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for STR Quality Assurance in 2026.
Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for RP Sanjiv Goenka Group in 2026.
Incident History - STR Quality Assurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)
STR Quality Assurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - RP Sanjiv Goenka Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
RP Sanjiv Goenka Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

STR Quality Assurance

RP Sanjiv Goenka Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.